From: Daedalus <daedalus@projecticarus.com>
To: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Is Single step into C++ virtual thunk still broken?
Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2002 06:47:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1026135745.26012.18.camel@pan> (raw)
I have waded through the archives but can't find anything newer than 1
year ago discussing this.
I'm using latest cvs gdb and gcc3.1. and specifiying DWARF-2 debug info.
When I single step into a virtual member function of a polymorphic
object in my C++ app, the source display heads off to some random line
in a header file, and another single step takes me back to the next
source line after the virtual function.
Putting a breakpoint in the actual function being called works as
expected.
I quote from a message by Andrew Cagney, 28 Jun 2001:
*****************************
> - Skipping vtable thunks, if necessary
I don't know if this was ever discussed on this list. As I understand
it, v3 virtual function is sometimes called via a ``thunk''. A
``thunk'' pulls a rabbit out of a hat (finds the correct object to pass
to the real function) and then passes control to the real function.
At present, if GDB stepped into a thunk it would find no line info,
treat it like a library and just skip it - oops, step into virtual
functions via thunks doesn't work.
One proposed solution is to mimic / generalize the shared library
mechanism so that GDB will single step through it to the real function.
I think this bug is pretty serious since, GDB will, randomly loose
control over the target. I certainly think it is more serious than the
constructor problem.
*****************************
Is this still broke, or am I missing something?
Andrew Walrond
Project Icarus
next reply other threads:[~2002-07-08 13:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-07-08 6:47 Daedalus [this message]
2002-07-08 6:52 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-07-09 8:56 Daedalus
2002-07-09 9:27 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-07-09 11:44 ` Daedalus
2002-07-09 11:51 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-07-09 13:10 ` Daedalus
[not found] ` <20020709202005.GA23405@nevyn.them.org>
2002-07-09 16:13 ` Daedalus
2002-07-09 14:14 Daedalus
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1026135745.26012.18.camel@pan \
--to=daedalus@projecticarus.com \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox