Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Antoine Tremblay <antoine.tremblay@ericsson.com>
To: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Cc: Antoine Tremblay <antoine.tremblay@ericsson.com>,
	<gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Fix failure to detach if threads exit while detaching on linux
Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2016 15:59:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <wwokr3cejmbg.fsf@ericsson.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49f3eb1e-d03d-e434-a831-e40f18f7823c@redhat.com>


Pedro Alves writes:

> On 06/03/2016 04:32 PM, Antoine Tremblay wrote:
>>>> >> +	#Don't try to exit gdbserver see above comment.
>>>> >> +	set gdbserver_reconnect_p 1
>>> >
>>> > I don't understand this one.  It shouldn't be needed.
>>> >
>> This one is needed since on the teardown of the .exp test gdb_exit is
>> called and calls monitor_exit which fails with a timeout this avoids
>> this and the original gdb_exit is called.
>
> Then that strikes me as the wrong thing to do.  We should instead
> expect that gdbserver exits cleanly, and then clear server_spawn_id.
>
> E.g.:
>
> proc test_server_exit {} {
>   global server_spawn_id
>   if ![info exists server_spawn_id] {
>     return
>   }
>   
>   set test "server exits"
>   gdb_expect {
>      -i $server_spawn_id
>      eof {
>         pass $test
> 	wait -i $server_spawn_id
>         unset server_spawn_id
>      }
>      timeout {
>        fail "$test (timeout)"
>      }
>    }
>   }
> }
>
> and then:
>
>     -re "Detaching from .*, process $decimal\r\nEnding remote debugging\.\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
>         # This is what you get with "target remote".
>         pass $test
>         # If testing with gdbserver, make sure it manages to exit.
>         test_server_exit
>     }
>

Thanks does seems much better !

However, testing it it triggers the test_server_exit timeout case, I'm
guessing because eof already happened and we're waiting for nothing ?

I'm tempted just to unset the var... but ideas are welcome..

Regards,
Antoine


  reply	other threads:[~2016-06-03 15:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-02 14:16 [PATCH] " Antoine Tremblay
2016-06-03 11:43 ` Pedro Alves
2016-06-03 11:55   ` Antoine Tremblay
2016-06-03 12:05     ` Pedro Alves
2016-06-03 14:49       ` [PATCH v2] " Antoine Tremblay
2016-06-03 15:16         ` Pedro Alves
2016-06-03 15:32           ` Antoine Tremblay
2016-06-03 15:45             ` Pedro Alves
2016-06-03 15:59               ` Antoine Tremblay [this message]
2016-06-03 16:21                 ` Pedro Alves
2016-06-03 16:43                   ` [PATCH v3] " Antoine Tremblay
2016-06-03 19:15                     ` Pedro Alves
2016-06-03 19:32                       ` Antoine Tremblay

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=wwokr3cejmbg.fsf@ericsson.com \
    --to=antoine.tremblay@ericsson.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=palves@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox