Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
To: Antoine Tremblay <antoine.tremblay@ericsson.com>,
	       gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Fix failure to detach if threads exit while detaching on linux
Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2016 15:16:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f6d86604-6cf9-3ba4-bec7-958b19e82400@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1464965361-25399-1-git-send-email-antoine.tremblay@ericsson.com>

On 06/03/2016 03:49 PM, Antoine Tremblay wrote:

> @@ -1491,7 +1523,28 @@ linux_nat_detach (struct target_ops *ops, const char *args, int from_tty)
>        linux_fork_detach (args, from_tty);
>      }
>    else
> -    linux_ops->to_detach (ops, args, from_tty);
> +    {
> +      TRY
> +	{
> +	  linux_ops->to_detach (ops, args, from_tty);
> +	}
> +      CATCH (ex, RETURN_MASK_ERROR)
> +	{
> +	  if (!check_ptrace_stopped_lwp_gone (main_lwp))
> +	    {
> +	      delete_lwp (main_lwp->ptid);

Is deleting the right thing to do?  I think we'll likely
crash, the next time we try to do something (e.g., try
to detach again).  Seems like on the gdbserver side,
the lwp isn't deleted in this case.

> +	      throw_exception (ex);
> +	    }
> +	  /* Ignore the error since the thread is gone already.  */
> +	  else
> +	    {
> +	      inferior_ptid = null_ptid;
> +	      detach_inferior (pid);
> +	      inf_child_maybe_unpush_target (ops);

Please factor these three lines out of inf_ptrace_attach into
a separate function, exported from inf-ptrace.h and called
from both places.  E.g.:

  extern void inf_ptrace_attach_success (struct target_ops *ops);

> +	    }
> +	}
> +    }
> +  delete_lwp (main_lwp->ptid);
>  }
>  

> +clean_restart ${testfile}
> +
> +if ![runto_main] {
> +    fail "Can't run to main to check for trace support"

"to check for trace support" is stale.

> +    return -1
> +}
> +
> +gdb_breakpoint "_exit"
> +gdb_continue_to_breakpoint "_exit" ".*_exit.*"
> +
> +# Since the gdbserver-native board ends remote debugging on detach,
> +# we can't use gdb_test as this function intercepts the Ending remote
> +# debugging message and tries to restart gdb.

Eh, that looks like a bogus think for gdb_test_multiple to be doing.

Seems like it's been there since "forever":

commit 19fa4a0af34ff07f260fc75e903ab92d8ca03d33
Author:     Mike Werner <mtw@cygnus>
AuthorDate: Sun Feb 21 20:03:55 1993 +0000

        * gdb/testsuite: Initial creation of gdb/testsuite.
        Migrated dejagnu testcases and support files for testing nm to
        gdb/testsuite from deja-gnu.  These files were moved "as is"
        with no modifications.  This migration is part of a major overhaul
        of dejagnu.  The modifications to these testcases, etc., which
        will allow them to work with the new version of dejagnu will be
        made in a future update.

I'd support just removing that bit.

In any case, there's no need to avoid gdb_test/gdb_test_multiple.
Any user-specified pattern overrides gdb_test_multiple's internal
patterns.  So you just need to intercept the  "Ending remote debugging"
message yourself.

> However, it can't do that
> +# as gdb_exit on this board will call monitor exit which will fail as
> +# we're not remote debugging anymore after a detach in this case.
> +send_gdb "detach\n"
> +gdb_expect {

set test "detach"
gdb_test_multiple $test $test {
    -re "Detaching from .*, process $decimal\r\nEnding remote debugging\.\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
        # This is what you get with "target remote".
        pass $test
    }
    -re "Detaching from .*, process $decimal\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
        pass $test
    }
}

> +    -re "Detaching from .*, process $decimal\r\nEnding remote debugging\." {

Missing $gdb_prompt match.

> +	#Don't try to exit gdbserver see above comment.
> +	set gdbserver_reconnect_p 1

I don't understand this one.  It shouldn't be needed.

> +	pass "detach non-extended"

Please use the same test message for all branches:

  pass $test

> +    }
> +    -re "Detaching from .*, process $decimal\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
> +	pass "detach"
> +    }
> +    -re ".*$gdb_prompt $" {
> +        fail "detach"
> +    }
> +    timeout {
> +	fail "detach timeout"

FYI, this would have been the standard:

> +	fail "$test (timeout)"

> +    }
> +}
> 

Thanks,
Pedro Alves


  reply	other threads:[~2016-06-03 15:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-02 14:16 [PATCH] " Antoine Tremblay
2016-06-03 11:43 ` Pedro Alves
2016-06-03 11:55   ` Antoine Tremblay
2016-06-03 12:05     ` Pedro Alves
2016-06-03 14:49       ` [PATCH v2] " Antoine Tremblay
2016-06-03 15:16         ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2016-06-03 15:32           ` Antoine Tremblay
2016-06-03 15:45             ` Pedro Alves
2016-06-03 15:59               ` Antoine Tremblay
2016-06-03 16:21                 ` Pedro Alves
2016-06-03 16:43                   ` [PATCH v3] " Antoine Tremblay
2016-06-03 19:15                     ` Pedro Alves
2016-06-03 19:32                       ` Antoine Tremblay

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f6d86604-6cf9-3ba4-bec7-958b19e82400@redhat.com \
    --to=palves@redhat.com \
    --cc=antoine.tremblay@ericsson.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox