Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: RFA: make sim interface use gdbarch methods for collect/supply
Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2004 22:13:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <vt2oemy83eh.fsf@zenia.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <40E57CDF.8090809@gnu.org>


Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org> writes:
> > At the moment, remote-sim.c's gdbsim_fetch_register and
> > gdbsim_store_register functions assume that the simulator's register
> > set (as visible via sim_fetch_register and sim_store_register)
> > corresponds exactly to GDB's raw register set.  This patch is meant to
> > remove that assumption.
> 
> Why do we need this extra level of indirection?  Since gdb/sim are
> paired at the source code level, we can simply change the gdb/sim
> interface.

You mean (in this case) just go in and tweak sim/ppc/sim_calls.c so
that the sim's register set (as viewed by sim_fetch_register and
sim_store_register) does match GDB's raw regcache?

It seems to me that one ought to be able to rearrange an
architecture's raw regcache without changing code outside the gdb
directory: it's supposed to be an internal interface.  If the
implementations of sim_* in the 'sim' subtree are considered internal
to GDB, then that seems like a misstructuring.


  reply	other threads:[~2004-07-02 22:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-06-30 15:48 Jim Blandy
2004-06-30 15:53 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-06-30 17:00   ` Jim Blandy
2004-07-01  2:48     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-07-01 17:23       ` Jim Blandy
2004-07-01 17:31         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-07-01 18:45           ` Jim Blandy
2004-07-01 18:48             ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-07-02 15:39               ` Andrew Cagney
2004-07-06 15:38                 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-07-06 17:10                   ` Jim Blandy
2004-07-06 17:17                     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-07-15 18:35                       ` Jim Blandy
2004-07-16 15:01                         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-07-06 17:43                   ` Andrew Cagney
2004-07-06 18:31                     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-07-02 15:19 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-07-02 22:13   ` Jim Blandy [this message]
2004-07-06 15:18     ` Andrew Cagney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=vt2oemy83eh.fsf@zenia.home \
    --to=jimb@redhat.com \
    --cc=cagney@gnu.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox