Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: RFA: make sim interface use gdbarch methods for collect/supply
Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 18:45:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <vt2d63fa7oa.fsf@zenia.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040701173102.GA14843@nevyn.them.org>


Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org> writes:
> GDB won't have to know where to place their contents in the buffer!
> That's the point of using a regset.  You convert the 'g' packet output
> to a binary blob in the obvious way, and then that's your regset.  The
> target architecture supplies a regset that expects the format provided
> by the 'g' packet.  Is there some problem with that plan?

No, regsets are perfect for 'g'.  I was thinking of the single-
register case (all under the assumption that we'd like to restrict
uses of supply_register and collect_register to regset functions).
What do you do with, say, the individual registers from your fancy 'T'
reply?

As far as I can tell, regsets don't serve this case well, which makes
them (in their current state) less than suitable as a universal
register transfer interface.


  reply	other threads:[~2004-07-01 18:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-06-30 15:48 Jim Blandy
2004-06-30 15:53 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-06-30 17:00   ` Jim Blandy
2004-07-01  2:48     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-07-01 17:23       ` Jim Blandy
2004-07-01 17:31         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-07-01 18:45           ` Jim Blandy [this message]
2004-07-01 18:48             ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-07-02 15:39               ` Andrew Cagney
2004-07-06 15:38                 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-07-06 17:10                   ` Jim Blandy
2004-07-06 17:17                     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-07-15 18:35                       ` Jim Blandy
2004-07-16 15:01                         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-07-06 17:43                   ` Andrew Cagney
2004-07-06 18:31                     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-07-02 15:19 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-07-02 22:13   ` Jim Blandy
2004-07-06 15:18     ` Andrew Cagney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=vt2d63fa7oa.fsf@zenia.home \
    --to=jimb@redhat.com \
    --cc=drow@false.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox