From: Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com>
To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: RFC: Use program_transform_name correctly
Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2003 21:42:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <vt265j0hgj4.fsf@zenia.home> (raw)
It seems as if some Makefiles aren't properly using
program_transform_name.
The same kind of weirdness corrected(?) in the patch below appears in
gdb/Makefile.in, so I'm not at all sure I'm not misunderstanding
what's going on. If folks agree that the change below would be
correct, then I'll put together a larger patch that fixes the ones I
can find elsewhere, too.
(Not sure why this hasn't come up before; Daniel J.'s recent posts on
the topic seem to be about setting program_transform_name, not on how
to use it.)
2003-10-07 Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com>
* Makefile.in (RUNTEST_FOR_TARGET): Pass the transformation to set
properly.
Index: gdb/testsuite//Makefile.in
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/cvsfiles/devo/gdb/testsuite/Makefile.in,v
retrieving revision 1.66
diff -c -r1.66 Makefile.in
*** gdb/testsuite//Makefile.in 9 Sep 2003 21:03:53 -0000 1.66
--- gdb/testsuite//Makefile.in 7 Oct 2003 21:33:22 -0000
***************
*** 53,59 ****
if [ "$(host_canonical)" = "$(target_canonical)" ]; then \
echo runtest; \
else \
! t='$(program_transform_name)'; echo runtest | sed -e '' $$t; \
fi; \
fi`
--- 53,59 ----
if [ "$(host_canonical)" = "$(target_canonical)" ]; then \
echo runtest; \
else \
! t='$(program_transform_name)'; echo runtest | sed -e '$$t'; \
fi; \
fi`
next reply other threads:[~2003-10-07 21:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-10-07 21:42 Jim Blandy [this message]
2003-10-07 21:50 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-10-07 22:03 ` Theodore A. Roth
2003-10-07 22:53 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-10-07 23:59 ` Felix Lee
2003-10-08 1:05 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-10-08 19:15 ` Jim Blandy
2003-10-08 19:18 ` Jim Blandy
2003-10-08 19:31 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-10-08 19:51 ` Andreas Schwab
2003-10-08 21:22 ` Felix Lee
2003-10-08 19:32 ` Jim Blandy
2003-10-08 19:52 ` Theodore A. Roth
2003-10-08 21:32 ` Felix Lee
2003-10-09 2:09 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-10-08 19:14 ` Jim Blandy
2003-10-07 22:48 ` Felix Lee
2003-10-08 17:44 ` Jim Blandy
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-01-29 22:48 [RFC] Move ``length'' from struct main_type to struct type Kevin Buettner
2003-01-29 23:14 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
[not found] ` <drow@mvista.com>
2003-01-30 0:57 ` Kevin Buettner
2003-02-07 21:45 ` Kevin Buettner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=vt265j0hgj4.fsf@zenia.home \
--to=jimb@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox