Re: PATCH: correctly place new inclusions in includer's list

[Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com>]

Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com> writes:

> > On 22 Sep 2003 12:57:29 -0500, Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com> said:
> >
> >> I think this would be good to include on the 6.0 branch; would that
> >> be okay?
> > I've seen macrotab seg faults intermittently over the last few
> > months;
> > I've been too lazy to track them down (they're hard to reproduce, and
> > I didn't know if it was something weird about my branch or a bug in
> > mainline), but if this patch might fix them, and if it's as trivial as
> > it seems, then putting it in 6.0 makes sense to me.
> 
> Ok.  Testcase on mainline?

(Are you asking David about tests for his segfaults, or me about tests
for the bug my patch fixes?  Assuming the latter...)

No... let me see if I can whip one up.  It would have to be
GCC-specific, since we need to use certain GCC-specific flags to
produce debug info that used to bring about the internal error.