Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Pedro Alves <pedro_alves@portugalmail.pt>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [New WinCE support] [patch 4/4] The bulk of the code.
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 12:52:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <uy7lxnydu.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45F9FC33.9020106@portugalmail.pt> (message from Pedro Alves on 	Fri, 16 Mar 2007 02:08:51 +0000)

> Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 02:08:51 +0000
> From: Pedro Alves <pedro_alves@portugalmail.pt>
> 
> This patch is the bulk of the new WinCE support.

Thanks.

I have a few comments.

> +static char *
> +strwinerror (DWORD error)
> +{
> +  static char buf[1024];
> +  wchar_t msgbuf[1024];
> +  DWORD chars = FormatMessageW (
> +		FORMAT_MESSAGE_FROM_SYSTEM,
> +                NULL,
> +                error,
> +                0, /* Default language */
> +                (LPVOID)&msgbuf,
> +                0,
> +                NULL);

Instead of using an arbitrary size 1024 (btw, you don't check whether
FormatMessageW indicated that it needed more than 1024), isn't it
better to use FORMAT_MESSAGE_ALLOCATE_BUFFER?  As a bonus, it would
avoid overwriting the static buffer on each call, which is not a nice
API, IMHO.

> +#ifdef __MINGW32CE__
> +  err = strwinerror (GetLastError ());
> +#else
>    err = strerror (errno);
> +#endif

Why not call strwinerror strerror and avoid the ifdef?

> doc/ChangeLog
> 
> 	* gdb.texinfo (WinCE): Delete subsection.

Why?  Is that subsection incorrect in some ways?


  reply	other threads:[~2007-03-16 12:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20070315235008.243411000@portugalmail.pt>
2007-03-16  2:07 ` [New WinCE support] [patch 1/4] : mv win32-i386-low.c win32-low.c Pedro Alves
2007-03-27 19:11   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-03-16  2:09 ` [New WinCE support] [patch 2/4] : s/thread_info/win32_thread_info/g Pedro Alves
2007-03-27 19:12   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-03-16  2:09 ` [New WinCE support] [patch 3/4] : bfd config Pedro Alves
2007-03-16  2:10 ` [New WinCE support] [patch 4/4] The bulk of the code Pedro Alves
2007-03-16 12:52   ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2007-03-16 15:03     ` pedro alves
2007-03-17 11:18       ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-03-17 11:35         ` Andreas Schwab
2007-03-19  1:53         ` Pedro Alves
2007-03-19  4:21           ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-03-19 12:34             ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-03-27 19:20           ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-03-29  3:18             ` Pedro Alves
2007-03-29  3:51             ` Pedro Alves
2007-03-30 11:56               ` Pierre Muller
2007-03-30 12:23                 ` pedro alves
2007-03-30 20:35                   ` pedro alves

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=uy7lxnydu.fsf@gnu.org \
    --to=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=pedro_alves@portugalmail.pt \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox