Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@elta.co.il>
To: Orjan Friberg <orjan.friberg@axis.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Display of read/access watchpoints when HAVE_NONSTEPPABLE_WATCHPOINT
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2003 10:26:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ur81oqb1c.fsf@elta.co.il> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3F83CFD1.8010002@axis.com> (message from Orjan Friberg on Wed, 08 Oct 2003 10:50:25 +0200)

> Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2003 10:50:25 +0200
> From: Orjan Friberg <orjan.friberg@axis.com>
> 
> The problem seems to be that target_stopped_data_address () is called in 
> bp_stop_status () *after* the single-step over the disabled breakpoint 
> has been carried out, at which point the target is no longer stopped due 
> to a hardware watchpoint (but due to the single-step).  Consequently, 
> target_stopped_data_address () returns 0, and gdb thinks that the 
> watchpoint didn't hit.  I can't see that any other targets keep the last 
> "stopped data address" until the next hardware watchpoint is hit (which 
> would make the address still available after the single-step).

Perhaps none of the targets that support hardware read and access
watchpoints define HAVE_NONSTEPPABLE_WATCHPOINT?

Anyway, from your description, it is quite clear that if a target
defines HAVE_NONSTEPPABLE_WATCHPOINT, GDB must call
target_stopped_data_address before it disables the watchpoint and
steps over it, or else the target end should store the necessary info
somewhere and deliver it when target_stopped_data_address is called.

In other words, it sounds like a bug.


  reply	other threads:[~2003-10-08 10:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-10-08  8:50 Orjan Friberg
2003-10-08 10:26 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2003-10-08 13:36   ` Orjan Friberg
2003-10-08 16:02     ` Paul Koning
2004-04-06 10:14   ` Orjan Friberg
2004-04-06 14:22     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-04-07  9:11       ` Orjan Friberg
2004-04-15  8:17       ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-04-15 13:24         ` Orjan Friberg
2004-04-16  7:18           ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-04-16  9:46             ` Orjan Friberg
2004-04-16 11:42           ` Orjan Friberg
2004-04-17  8:27             ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-04-19 14:59               ` Orjan Friberg
2004-04-22 15:08                 ` Orjan Friberg
2004-04-22 15:48                   ` Paul Koning
2004-04-22 18:40                   ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-04-22 19:07                     ` Paul Koning
2004-04-22 19:09                       ` Paul Koning
2004-04-23 18:20                       ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-04-23 18:22                   ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-04-26  9:04                     ` Orjan Friberg
2004-04-26  9:25                       ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-05-01 21:18                   ` Mark Kettenis
2004-05-02  4:48                     ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-05-03 11:25                       ` Orjan Friberg
2004-05-03 15:05                         ` Andrew Cagney
2004-05-03 18:01                           ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-05-03 18:36                             ` Andrew Cagney
2004-05-03 17:49                         ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-05-04  7:31                           ` Orjan Friberg
2004-05-04 23:52                             ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-05-04 22:10 Ulrich Weigand
2004-05-05  5:08 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-05-05  8:26   ` Orjan Friberg
2004-05-06  4:58     ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-05-06 14:21       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-05-06 18:02         ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-05-06 18:05           ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-05-07  8:18             ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-05-06 21:34   ` Ulrich Weigand
2004-05-06 21:36     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-05-07  8:22       ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-05-07  8:23     ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-05-05 13:44 ` Paul Koning
2004-05-06  5:08   ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-05-06 13:44     ` Paul Koning
2004-05-06 21:38   ` Ulrich Weigand
2004-05-06 21:49     ` Paul Koning
2004-05-07  8:18     ` Eli Zaretskii

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ur81oqb1c.fsf@elta.co.il \
    --to=eliz@elta.co.il \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=orjan.friberg@axis.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox