From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@elta.co.il>
To: Orjan Friberg <orjan.friberg@axis.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Display of read/access watchpoints when HAVE_NONSTEPPABLE_WATCHPOINT
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2003 10:26:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ur81oqb1c.fsf@elta.co.il> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3F83CFD1.8010002@axis.com> (message from Orjan Friberg on Wed, 08 Oct 2003 10:50:25 +0200)
> Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2003 10:50:25 +0200
> From: Orjan Friberg <orjan.friberg@axis.com>
>
> The problem seems to be that target_stopped_data_address () is called in
> bp_stop_status () *after* the single-step over the disabled breakpoint
> has been carried out, at which point the target is no longer stopped due
> to a hardware watchpoint (but due to the single-step). Consequently,
> target_stopped_data_address () returns 0, and gdb thinks that the
> watchpoint didn't hit. I can't see that any other targets keep the last
> "stopped data address" until the next hardware watchpoint is hit (which
> would make the address still available after the single-step).
Perhaps none of the targets that support hardware read and access
watchpoints define HAVE_NONSTEPPABLE_WATCHPOINT?
Anyway, from your description, it is quite clear that if a target
defines HAVE_NONSTEPPABLE_WATCHPOINT, GDB must call
target_stopped_data_address before it disables the watchpoint and
steps over it, or else the target end should store the necessary info
somewhere and deliver it when target_stopped_data_address is called.
In other words, it sounds like a bug.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-10-08 10:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-10-08 8:50 Orjan Friberg
2003-10-08 10:26 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2003-10-08 13:36 ` Orjan Friberg
2003-10-08 16:02 ` Paul Koning
2004-04-06 10:14 ` Orjan Friberg
2004-04-06 14:22 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-04-07 9:11 ` Orjan Friberg
2004-04-15 8:17 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-04-15 13:24 ` Orjan Friberg
2004-04-16 7:18 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-04-16 9:46 ` Orjan Friberg
2004-04-16 11:42 ` Orjan Friberg
2004-04-17 8:27 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-04-19 14:59 ` Orjan Friberg
2004-04-22 15:08 ` Orjan Friberg
2004-04-22 15:48 ` Paul Koning
2004-04-22 18:40 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-04-22 19:07 ` Paul Koning
2004-04-22 19:09 ` Paul Koning
2004-04-23 18:20 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-04-23 18:22 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-04-26 9:04 ` Orjan Friberg
2004-04-26 9:25 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-05-01 21:18 ` Mark Kettenis
2004-05-02 4:48 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-05-03 11:25 ` Orjan Friberg
2004-05-03 15:05 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-05-03 18:01 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-05-03 18:36 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-05-03 17:49 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-05-04 7:31 ` Orjan Friberg
2004-05-04 23:52 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-05-04 22:10 Ulrich Weigand
2004-05-05 5:08 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-05-05 8:26 ` Orjan Friberg
2004-05-06 4:58 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-05-06 14:21 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-05-06 18:02 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-05-06 18:05 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-05-07 8:18 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-05-06 21:34 ` Ulrich Weigand
2004-05-06 21:36 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-05-07 8:22 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-05-07 8:23 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-05-05 13:44 ` Paul Koning
2004-05-06 5:08 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-05-06 13:44 ` Paul Koning
2004-05-06 21:38 ` Ulrich Weigand
2004-05-06 21:49 ` Paul Koning
2004-05-07 8:18 ` Eli Zaretskii
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ur81oqb1c.fsf@elta.co.il \
--to=eliz@elta.co.il \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=orjan.friberg@axis.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox