From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Paul Koning <pkoning@equallogic.com>
Cc: weigand@i1.informatik.uni-erlangen.de, orjan.friberg@axis.com,
kettenis@chello.nl, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com,
drow@false.org
Subject: Re: Display of read/access watchpoints when HAVE_NONSTEPPABLE_WATCHPOINT
Date: Thu, 06 May 2004 05:08:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <uekpyqe5t.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <16536.61374.770000.659411@gargle.gargle.HOWL> (message from Paul Koning on Wed, 5 May 2004 09:44:30 -0400)
> Date: Wed, 5 May 2004 09:44:30 -0400
> From: Paul Koning <pkoning@equallogic.com>
>
> Ulrich> We don't define target_stopped_data_address, and *cannot* do
> Ulrich> so because the hardware doesn't provide this information.
>
> Neither does MIPS, unless you disassemble the trapping instruction to
> deduce the address. That's what I've done in our MIPS remote gdb
> stub.
Would the suggested STOPPED_BY_WATCHPOINT patch work for the MIPS
remote stub?
> The trouble I ran into is that this doesn't work because (on remote
> target support for MIPS anyway) the watchpoint handling does an
> effective "stepi" after the watchpoint stop. After that stepi,
> stopped_by_watchpoint() would return false because the most recent
> stop was due to a break (the stepi).
But that is something the target-side code could handle, right? I
mean, stopped_by_watchpoint has intimate knowledge about the target's
particulars, so it could fiddle the stop reason if it saw the
indication that a watchpoint fired _and_ that the most recent stop was
due to a single-step, right?
Failing that, we could have something like AUTO_STEPI_AFTER_WATCHPOINT
in higher-level code in GDB (infrun.c or breakpoint.c) to handle such
targets, but I generally think that the GDB application-level code
should not bother itself with target-specific peculiarities if we can
avoid that.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-05-06 5:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-05-04 22:10 Ulrich Weigand
2004-05-05 5:08 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-05-05 8:26 ` Orjan Friberg
2004-05-06 4:58 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-05-06 14:21 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-05-06 18:02 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-05-06 18:05 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-05-07 8:18 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-05-06 21:34 ` Ulrich Weigand
2004-05-06 21:36 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-05-07 8:22 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-05-07 8:23 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-05-10 17:39 ` [PATCH] Fix watchpoints on s390 Ulrich Weigand
2004-05-11 6:27 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-05-05 13:44 ` Display of read/access watchpoints when HAVE_NONSTEPPABLE_WATCHPOINT Paul Koning
2004-05-06 5:08 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2004-05-06 13:44 ` Paul Koning
2004-05-06 21:38 ` Ulrich Weigand
2004-05-06 21:49 ` Paul Koning
2004-05-07 8:18 ` Eli Zaretskii
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-10-08 8:50 Orjan Friberg
2003-10-08 10:26 ` Eli Zaretskii
2003-10-08 13:36 ` Orjan Friberg
2003-10-08 16:02 ` Paul Koning
2004-04-06 10:14 ` Orjan Friberg
2004-04-06 14:22 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-04-07 9:11 ` Orjan Friberg
2004-04-15 8:17 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-04-15 13:24 ` Orjan Friberg
2004-04-16 7:18 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-04-16 9:46 ` Orjan Friberg
2004-04-16 11:42 ` Orjan Friberg
2004-04-17 8:27 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-04-19 14:59 ` Orjan Friberg
2004-04-22 15:08 ` Orjan Friberg
2004-04-22 15:48 ` Paul Koning
2004-04-22 18:40 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-04-22 19:07 ` Paul Koning
2004-04-22 19:09 ` Paul Koning
2004-04-23 18:20 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-04-23 18:22 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-04-26 9:04 ` Orjan Friberg
2004-04-26 9:25 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-05-01 21:18 ` Mark Kettenis
2004-05-02 4:48 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-05-03 11:25 ` Orjan Friberg
2004-05-03 15:05 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-05-03 18:01 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-05-03 18:36 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-05-03 17:49 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-05-04 7:31 ` Orjan Friberg
2004-05-04 23:52 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=uekpyqe5t.fsf@gnu.org \
--to=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=drow@false.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=kettenis@chello.nl \
--cc=orjan.friberg@axis.com \
--cc=pkoning@equallogic.com \
--cc=weigand@i1.informatik.uni-erlangen.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox