Re: [patch] Remove BITS_BIG_ENDIAN from defs.h

[Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>]

> Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 06:57:05 +0100
> From: Markus Deuling <deuling@de.ibm.com>
> CC: GDB Patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>,
>         Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> 
> Eli, is the documentation ok like this ?

I have a few comments:

> ChangeLog Doc:
> 
> 	* gdbint.texinfo (BITS_BIG_ENDIAN): Rewrite to match
> 	gdbarch_bits_big_endian.

Actually, this should say something like:

	* gdbint.texinfo (Target Conditionals): Replace the
	description of BITS_BIG_ENDIAN with a description of
	gdbarch_bits_big_endian.

Note that the text in parens is the name of the node in which you make
the change.

> +@item gdbarch_bits_big_endian (@var{gdbarch})
> +@findex gdbarch_bits_big_endian
> +Set this if the numbering of bits in the targets does @strong{not} match the

"Set this" isn't right, because you don't "set" a function.  I think
it's better to say "Define this to return non-zero it bits are
numbered in the big-endian order (i.e., the rightmost bit has the
largest number), zero otherwise."

Btw, should we also document set_gdbarch_bits_big_endian?