From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Pierre Muller <muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, gdb@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: GDB ARIndex cleanup
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 08:47:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <uocvnmk7d.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <001101c9aeb3$e41cee10$ac56ca30$@u-strasbg.fr>
> From: "Pierre Muller" <muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr>
> Cc: <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>, <gdb@sourceware.org>
> Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 09:13:19 +0100
>
> > > 3) I also recompiled doschk program
> > > so that the list of incompatibilities with
> > > the DOS limitations is generated again...
> > >
> > > Eli, there are probably several directories that we could
> > > disregard for this, but I think that
> > > there are also real issues left.
> >
> > There shouldn't be any. But to see that, you need to prepare a GDB
> > tarball, then untar it using djunpack.bat as explained in
> > gdb/config/djgpp/README, and _then_ run doschk on the resulting tree.
> > That's because the file-name conflicts are supposed to be solved by
> > remapping in gdb/config/djgpp/fnchange.lst, which djunpack.bat uses.
>
> The question is:
> how do you prepare a tarball that contains only the directories required
> by DJGPP?
There's no such thing as a tarball with only the directories required
by DJGPP. You need a normal GDB tarball, like the ones prepared when
GDB is officially released. djunpack.bat is designed to work with
such a general-purpose tarball. You should also be able to use the
snapshot tarballs you can find on sourceware.
> The list of problems is available on the web page:
> http://sourceware.org/gdb/current/ari/ari.doschk.bug
Thanks, I will take a look.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-27 8:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-26 15:29 Pierre Muller
2009-03-26 20:53 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-03-27 8:23 ` Pierre Muller
2009-03-27 8:47 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2009-03-27 14:12 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-03-27 15:35 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-04-02 15:12 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2009-04-02 19:40 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-04-02 20:34 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-03-26 23:18 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-03-27 2:22 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2009-03-27 8:43 ` Pierre Muller
2009-03-27 16:04 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-03-27 16:46 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2009-04-14 23:06 ` [RFC] GDB ARIndex Linux rule cleanup Pierre Muller
2009-04-14 23:23 ` Mark Kettenis
2009-04-14 23:38 ` Pedro Alves
2009-04-14 23:41 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-04-15 7:06 ` Pierre Muller
2009-04-15 7:33 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-04-15 14:00 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-04-15 14:21 ` Pedro Alves
2009-04-15 15:32 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-04-15 15:54 ` Pedro Alves
2009-04-15 14:25 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-04-15 15:15 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2009-04-15 15:23 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-04-15 15:34 ` Mark Kettenis
2009-04-15 16:00 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-04-15 16:04 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-04-15 17:34 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-04-15 18:07 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-04-15 18:55 ` Ulrich Weigand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=uocvnmk7d.fsf@gnu.org \
--to=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
--cc=muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox