Re: [RFA] new command to search memory

[Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>]

> Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 18:19:15 -0800 (PST)
> From: dje@google.com (Doug Evans)
> 
> I didn't get a response to the non-doc portions of this patch.
> [Eli, thanks for the doc review, I made the suggested changes,
> though I went a different route in shortening the length of the
> line specifying the find command syntax.  The end result is still
> rather short.]

You mean, rather long...

The patch is okay with me, but could you (or someone else) please see
whether these two long lines

> +@item find @r{[}/@var{sn}@r{]} @var{start_addr}, @@@var{len}, @var{val1} @r{[}, @var{val2}, @dots{}@r{]}
> +@itemx find @r{[}/@var{sn}@r{]} @var{start_addr}, @var{end_addr}, @var{val1} @r{[}, @var{val2}, @dots{}@r{]}

survive the typesetting for the printed manual (either by TeX or
pdftex) without overflowing the page margin?  I'm afraid they will
overflow, since the items of this table are typeset with @code, and
@code specifies a chunk of monospaced font that cannot be broken
between lines.