From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [commit] Cleanup display.c (and a bit of tracepoint.c too)
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 03:22:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <u7j2bk36w.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200607172216.k6HMGUfa023698@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> (message from Mark Kettenis on Tue, 18 Jul 2006 00:16:30 +0200 (CEST))
> Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 00:16:30 +0200 (CEST)
> From: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
>
> After inviting people to remove redundant prototypes for static
> functions, I thought I'd set an example.
Aren't there compilers out there which insist on forward declarations
for static functions?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-18 3:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-17 22:16 Mark Kettenis
2006-07-18 3:22 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2006-07-18 12:31 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-07-18 19:56 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-07-18 20:00 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-07-18 20:26 ` Andreas Schwab
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=u7j2bk36w.fsf@gnu.org \
--to=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox