From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-44991-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 20709 invoked by alias); 18 Jul 2006 03:22:05 -0000
Received: (qmail 20701 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Jul 2006 03:22:04 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from nitzan.inter.net.il (HELO nitzan.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.20)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Jul 2006 03:22:03 +0000
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-80-230-141-38.inter.net.il [80.230.141.38]) 	by nitzan.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA) 	with ESMTP id EET60323 (AUTH halo1); 	Tue, 18 Jul 2006 06:21:55 +0300 (IDT)
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 03:22:00 -0000
Message-Id: <u7j2bk36w.fsf@gnu.org>
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
In-reply-to: <200607172216.k6HMGUfa023698@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> (message 	from Mark Kettenis on Tue, 18 Jul 2006 00:16:30 +0200 (CEST))
Subject: Re: [commit] Cleanup display.c (and a bit of tracepoint.c too)
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
References:  <200607172216.k6HMGUfa023698@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2006-07/txt/msg00217.txt.bz2

> Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 00:16:30 +0200 (CEST)
> From: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
> 
> After inviting people to remove redundant prototypes for static
> functions, I thought I'd set an example.

Aren't there compilers out there which insist on forward declarations
for static functions?