From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [RFA/doco] Document task-specific breakpoints
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 18:47:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <u63hun9hu.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090327161051.GU9472@adacore.com>
> Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 09:10:51 -0700
> From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
>
> The problem is that I don't understand what it is that is so confusing
> to you.
What is confusing is this:
(@value{GDBP}) info tasks
ID TID P-ID Pri State Name
1 140022020 0 15 Child Activation Wait main_task
2 140045060 1 15 Accept/Select Wait t2
3 140044840 1 15 Runnable t1
* 4 140056040 1 15 Running t3
Task 2 is running, okay.
(@value{GDBP}) b 15 task 2
Breakpoint 5 at 0x120044cb0: file test_task_debug.adb, line 15.
Set a breakpoint for task 2.
Breakpoint 5, test_task_debug () at test_task_debug.adb:15
Breakpoint is hit by task 2.
(@value{GDBP}) info tasks
ID TID P-ID Pri State Name
1 140022020 0 15 Child Activation Wait main_task
* 2 140045060 1 15 Running t2
3 140044840 1 15 Runnable t1
4 140056040 1 15 Delay Sleep t3
And task 2 is still running, even though it has hit the breakpoint.
Did I succeed in explaining what is confusing? The task was running,
then it hit the breakpoint, but it is still "running".
If this is normal, at least remove the second "info tasks" and its
output from the example.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-27 17:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-25 22:02 Joel Brobecker
2009-03-25 22:11 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-03-26 13:10 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-03-26 22:50 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-03-27 11:56 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-03-27 15:39 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-03-27 15:50 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-03-27 16:11 ` Tom Tromey
2009-03-27 16:36 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-03-27 16:59 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-03-27 18:47 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2009-04-09 16:47 ` Tom Tromey
2009-04-09 16:59 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-04-09 17:19 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-04-09 17:33 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-04-09 17:40 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-04-09 20:14 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-03-31 18:31 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-03-31 20:20 ` Eli Zaretskii
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=u63hun9hu.fsf@gnu.org \
--to=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox