Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [RFA/doco] Document task-specific breakpoints
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 18:47:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <u63hun9hu.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090327161051.GU9472@adacore.com>

> Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 09:10:51 -0700
> From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> 
> The problem is that I don't understand what it is that is so confusing
> to you.

What is confusing is this:

    (@value{GDBP}) info tasks
      ID       TID P-ID Pri State                 Name
       1 140022020   0   15 Child Activation Wait main_task
       2 140045060   1   15 Accept/Select Wait    t2
       3 140044840   1   15 Runnable              t1
    *  4 140056040   1   15 Running               t3

Task 2 is running, okay.

    (@value{GDBP}) b 15 task 2
    Breakpoint 5 at 0x120044cb0: file test_task_debug.adb, line 15.

Set a breakpoint for task 2.

    Breakpoint 5, test_task_debug () at test_task_debug.adb:15

Breakpoint is hit by task 2.

    (@value{GDBP}) info tasks
      ID       TID P-ID Pri State                 Name
       1 140022020   0   15 Child Activation Wait main_task
    *  2 140045060   1   15 Running               t2
       3 140044840   1   15 Runnable              t1
       4 140056040   1   15 Delay Sleep           t3

And task 2 is still running, even though it has hit the breakpoint.

Did I succeed in explaining what is confusing?  The task was running,
then it hit the breakpoint, but it is still "running".

If this is normal, at least remove the second "info tasks" and its
output from the example.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-03-27 17:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-03-25 22:02 Joel Brobecker
2009-03-25 22:11 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-03-26 13:10   ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-03-26 22:50     ` Joel Brobecker
2009-03-27 11:56       ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-03-27 15:39         ` Joel Brobecker
2009-03-27 15:50           ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-03-27 16:11             ` Tom Tromey
2009-03-27 16:36             ` Joel Brobecker
2009-03-27 16:59               ` Joel Brobecker
2009-03-27 18:47               ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2009-04-09 16:47       ` Tom Tromey
2009-04-09 16:59         ` Joel Brobecker
2009-04-09 17:19           ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-04-09 17:33             ` Joel Brobecker
2009-04-09 17:40               ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-04-09 20:14                 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-03-31 18:31   ` Joel Brobecker
2009-03-31 20:20     ` Eli Zaretskii

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=u63hun9hu.fsf@gnu.org \
    --to=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox