Re: MI solib notification

[Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>]

> From: Vladimir Prus <vladimir@codesourcery.com>
> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 22:08:37 +0300
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>,
>  gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com,
>  nickrob@snap.net.nz
> 
> On Sunday 01 February 2009 21:29:18 Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 01, 2009 at 08:22:28PM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > > That'd be okay as well, although I don't really understand why it is
> > > better than my suggestion.
> > 
> > It's not a big difference; I find it more natural to have the output
> > all grouped together and looking similar to GDB's expected output.
> 
> I'd prefer this approach to, because that's how the rest of MI docs do it.

Do we have such long @item's elsewhere in the MI docs?  I made a quick
scan and didn't find any, but perhaps I missed something.

> But -- who to I force a break inside @item ?

You can't, AFAIK.  Maybe you could use @itemx for all lines but the
first one, but that would be a kludge.

P.S. Please in the future show the original code/Texinfo that prompted
the response above: that was 2 and a half weeks ago, and I no longer
remembered what was this about, nor had the original message in my
mailbox.  I had to go to the archives to know what we were talking
about.

TIA