Re: [PATCH] Remove gdb/nlm subdirectory

[Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>]

> Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 15:17:44 -0800
> From: "Jim Blandy" <jimb@red-bean.com>
> Cc: drow@false.org, eliz@gnu.org, sje@cup.hp.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> 
> Okay, I got confused, went back and actually parsed what everyone said
> about this, aside from the general deferentialness:
> 
> - I said I didn't think it was important to phase it out gradually.
> - Daniel said he'd not mind seeing it removed.
> - Eli said he saw no reason to have the staging period IF someone had
> reason to believe it was unused.  Daniel offered some reasons.
> - Mark wants it gone.
> 
> So we've got a general trend towards getting rid of it now, and if Eli
> found Daniel's reasons adequate, we've got consensus.

I interpreted Daniel's message as something like ``I'm not sure, I
just know we never heard any problem or patch''.  Which to me doesn't
sound as firm reasons, just as lack of any information.

So I think the patch you posted lately is okay for now.