Re: [PATCH] Remove gdb/nlm subdirectory

[Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>]

On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 11:46:20AM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 23:30:08 -0500
> > From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> > Cc: sje@cup.hp.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> > 
> > For things that folks still might, conceivably, be using in current
> > versions of GDB, and things that we still reasonably expect to work,
> > the obsoletion interval makes sense.
> 
> Do we have good reasons to believe the nlm stuff is not used, or
> cannot be built with a reasonable amount of effort?  If so, I see no
> reason to have the staging period.

Well, in all the time I've been working on GDB, I've never seen a user
question about Netware, a GNATS PR about Netware, or a developer commit
tested on Netware.  To build it you need a Netware-provided SDK; I
don't know if those are still obtainable.

> Otherwise, let's leave this for the next release.

I'm fine with that if you'd prefer.  I think we can ignore its old
configure file for now, then, instead of worrying about upgrading it to
2.5x (which started this discussion).

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery