From: David Carlton <carlton@math.stanford.edu>
To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, ezannoni@redhat.com, jimb@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [commit] remove DEPRECATED_SYMBOL_NAME uses from symtab.c
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2003 17:05:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ro1isrb6xaq.fsf@jackfruit.Stanford.EDU> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3EE8B108.7020306@redhat.com>
On Thu, 12 Jun 2003 12:57:44 -0400, Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com> said:
> Does this:
>> #define COMPLETION_LIST_ADD_SYMBOL(symbol, sym_text, len, text, word) \
>> - do { \
>> - if (SYMBOL_DEMANGLED_NAME (symbol) != NULL) \
>> - /* Put only the mangled name on the list. */ \
>> - /* Advantage: "b foo<TAB>" completes to "b foo(int, int)" */ \
>> - /* Disadvantage: "b foo__i<TAB>" doesn't complete. */ \
>> completion_list_add_name \
>> - (SYMBOL_DEMANGLED_NAME (symbol), (sym_text), (len), (text), (word)); \
>> - else \
>> - completion_list_add_name \
>> - (DEPRECATED_SYMBOL_NAME (symbol), (sym_text), (len), (text), (word)); \
>> - } while (0)
>> + (SYMBOL_NATURAL_NAME (symbol), (sym_text), (len), (text), (word))
> mean that COMPLETION_LIST_ADD_SYMBOL is also dead? (I have trouble
> reading unified diffs :-)
No, it's still there, it's just defined as follows now:
#define COMPLETION_LIST_ADD_SYMBOL(symbol, sym_text, len, text, word) \
completion_list_add_name \
(SYMBOL_NATURAL_NAME (symbol), (sym_text), (len), (text), (word))
One could argue the wisdom of keeping it around as a separate macro,
but that's a separate issue: all I wanted to do with that patch was
clean up deprecated stuff.
David Carlton
carlton@math.stanford.edu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-06-12 17:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-06-12 15:55 David Carlton
2003-06-12 16:57 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-06-12 17:01 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-06-12 17:05 ` David Carlton [this message]
2003-06-12 17:12 ` Andrew Cagney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ro1isrb6xaq.fsf@jackfruit.Stanford.EDU \
--to=carlton@math.stanford.edu \
--cc=ac131313@redhat.com \
--cc=ezannoni@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=jimb@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox