Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Carlton <carlton@math.stanford.edu>
To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>,
	gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, mec@shout.net
Subject: Re: [rfa/c++testsuite] (was Re: patch for PR gdb/574)
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 16:32:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ro14rcbko0u.fsf@jackfruit.Stanford.EDU> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3D94E7AE.4090403@redhat.com>

On Fri, 27 Sep 2002 19:20:14 -0400, Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com> said:

>> 2002-08-22  David Carlton  <carlton@math.stanford.edu>
>> * gdb.c++/pr-574.exp: New file.

>> * gdb.c++/pr-574.cc: New file.
>> 

> Suggest a rename to c++/gdb574.*.  MI's using that and got in just a
> tiny bit earlier :-)

Grump, grump, grump.  Being a lazy person, I will give the following
justification for my naming scheme: you're proposing to change the PR
naming category so that that PR would turn into c++574.  (Or do
existing closed PR's not get moved?)  So it would make more sense to
call it gdb.c++/c++574.cc, which sounds silly: the whole directory is
about C++!  And gdb.c++/gdb574.cc is only a little less silly, or
arguably even sillier: every single file in that directory, in its
parent, and in the parent of its parent is about GDB, so putting 'gdb'
in the name of a file is just plain old redundant.  Whereas putting
'pr' in the name of a file isn't redundant at all.

Seriously, though, I'll change it to whatever name you want for
consistency's sake; but if that name involves the PR category, then we
might as well wate until the planned PR category change is completed.

David Carlton
carlton@math.stanford.edu


  reply	other threads:[~2002-09-27 23:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-07-22 12:02 patch for PR gdb/574 david carlton
2002-07-22 12:16 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-07-22 12:18   ` david carlton
2002-07-23 16:47 ` Jim Blandy
2002-08-15 20:26 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-08-15 20:48   ` David Carlton
2002-08-16 16:10   ` [rfa/c++testsuite] (was Re: patch for PR gdb/574) David Carlton
2002-08-22 10:10     ` David Carlton
2002-09-27 16:20       ` Andrew Cagney
2002-09-27 16:32         ` David Carlton [this message]
2002-09-27 16:42           ` Andrew Cagney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ro14rcbko0u.fsf@jackfruit.Stanford.EDU \
    --to=carlton@math.stanford.edu \
    --cc=ac131313@redhat.com \
    --cc=drow@mvista.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=mec@shout.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox