Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: david carlton <carlton@math.Stanford.EDU>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
Cc: david carlton <carlton@math.Stanford.EDU>,
	gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Cc: carlton@math.Stanford.EDU
Subject: Re: patch for PR gdb/574
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2002 12:18:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <15676.23043.163785.123086@jackfruit.Stanford.EDU> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020722190220.GA6700@nevyn.them.org>

On Mon, 22 Jul 2002 15:02:20 -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com> said:

> First, do you have an FSF copyright assignment on file?

It's in the mail.

> Second of all, VALUE_ENCLOSING_TYPE is a bad idea, as far as I'm
> concerned.

Thanks for the feedback; I'll poke around some more in the ChangeLog.

> On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 11:42:58AM -0700, david carlton wrote:

>> Also (and this may be related to that bad memory access), there
>> seems to be a difference of opinion among various pieces of code as
>> to whose job it is to demangle symbols that you want to look up in
>> symbol tables.

> For the latter, generally one should look up demangled names.
> Especially now that I've hashed the symbol tables based on the
> demangled name!

symtab.c(lookup_symbol) still tries to demangle the symbol name.  I
poked around with this a bit last Friday, and I'm pretty sure that
this caused a problem (note that the rtti function was demangling the
name itself, and even demangling it beyond what cplus_demangle does).
I don't have enough of a feel for whose job it is to do what here to
be sure which functions are demangling inappropriately, but I'm pretty
sure that one of them is.

David Carlton
carlton@math.stanford.edu


  reply	other threads:[~2002-07-22 19:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-07-22 12:02 david carlton
2002-07-22 12:16 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-07-22 12:18   ` david carlton [this message]
2002-07-23 16:47 ` Jim Blandy
2002-08-15 20:26 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-08-15 20:48   ` David Carlton
2002-08-16 16:10   ` [rfa/c++testsuite] (was Re: patch for PR gdb/574) David Carlton
2002-08-22 10:10     ` David Carlton
2002-09-27 16:20       ` Andrew Cagney
2002-09-27 16:32         ` David Carlton
2002-09-27 16:42           ` Andrew Cagney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=15676.23043.163785.123086@jackfruit.Stanford.EDU \
    --to=carlton@math.stanford.edu \
    --cc=drow@mvista.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox