From: david carlton <carlton@math.Stanford.EDU>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
Cc: david carlton <carlton@math.Stanford.EDU>,
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Cc: carlton@math.Stanford.EDU
Subject: Re: patch for PR gdb/574
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2002 12:18:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <15676.23043.163785.123086@jackfruit.Stanford.EDU> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020722190220.GA6700@nevyn.them.org>
On Mon, 22 Jul 2002 15:02:20 -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com> said:
> First, do you have an FSF copyright assignment on file?
It's in the mail.
> Second of all, VALUE_ENCLOSING_TYPE is a bad idea, as far as I'm
> concerned.
Thanks for the feedback; I'll poke around some more in the ChangeLog.
> On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 11:42:58AM -0700, david carlton wrote:
>> Also (and this may be related to that bad memory access), there
>> seems to be a difference of opinion among various pieces of code as
>> to whose job it is to demangle symbols that you want to look up in
>> symbol tables.
> For the latter, generally one should look up demangled names.
> Especially now that I've hashed the symbol tables based on the
> demangled name!
symtab.c(lookup_symbol) still tries to demangle the symbol name. I
poked around with this a bit last Friday, and I'm pretty sure that
this caused a problem (note that the rtti function was demangling the
name itself, and even demangling it beyond what cplus_demangle does).
I don't have enough of a feel for whose job it is to do what here to
be sure which functions are demangling inappropriately, but I'm pretty
sure that one of them is.
David Carlton
carlton@math.stanford.edu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-07-22 19:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-07-22 12:02 david carlton
2002-07-22 12:16 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-07-22 12:18 ` david carlton [this message]
2002-07-23 16:47 ` Jim Blandy
2002-08-15 20:26 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-08-15 20:48 ` David Carlton
2002-08-16 16:10 ` [rfa/c++testsuite] (was Re: patch for PR gdb/574) David Carlton
2002-08-22 10:10 ` David Carlton
2002-09-27 16:20 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-09-27 16:32 ` David Carlton
2002-09-27 16:42 ` Andrew Cagney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=15676.23043.163785.123086@jackfruit.Stanford.EDU \
--to=carlton@math.stanford.edu \
--cc=drow@mvista.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox