Re: [PATCH 00/17] Implement gdbarch_gdb_signal_to_target

[Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@redhat.com>]

On Monday, July 01 2013, Andreas Schwab wrote:

> Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@redhat.com> writes:
>
>> What I did was to investigate, on the Linux kernel, which targets shared
>> the signal numbers definition with x86.  My approach was to make the x86
>> the "de facto" implementation, and extend only the needed bits on each
>> arch.  For the record, I used linux-3.10-rc6 as the main source of
>> information, always looking at
>> arch/<ARCH_NAME>/include/uapi/asm/signal.h.  For SIGRTMAX (which defaults
>> to _NSIG in most cases), I had to look at different signal-related
>> files, but most of them (except MIPS) were defined to 64 anyway.
>
> There is also include/uapi/asm-generic/signal.h (which happens to agree
> with x86 numbering) which will be used for every new architecture port.

Thanks for pointing that out.

> (Looks like you missed out aarch64.)

Indeed.  I will submit the patch with the funny subject "[PATCH
18/17]".

Thanks,

-- 
Sergio