From: Jim Blandy <jimb@codesourcery.com>
To: Michael Snyder <msnyder@specifix.com>
Cc: Rob Quill <rob.quill@gmail.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: New scope checking patch
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 17:06:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3wsqbow7d.fsf@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1200352032.3263.20.camel@localhost.localdomain> (Michael Snyder's message of "Mon, 14 Jan 2008 15:07:12 -0800")
Michael Snyder <msnyder at specifix.com> writes:
> On Fri, 2008-01-11 at 14:50 -0800, Jim Blandy wrote:
>
>> Use 'cvs diff -u' or 'cvs diff -c' to produce unified or context
>> diffs. Unified diffs seem to be the more widely preferred form these
>> days. All patches posted to this list (or pretty much to any other
>> open source list) should be in unified or context diff form.
>
> In a previous thread, we sort of reached (or approached)
> a loose consensus that "diff -up" is preferred.
>
> You didn't mention -p, but folks didn't like -p without the -u
> anyways...
Sounds good to me.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-15 17:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-12 16:29 Rob Quill
2007-11-12 23:26 ` Michael Snyder
2008-01-10 1:00 ` Jim Blandy
2008-01-11 0:52 ` Rob Quill
2008-01-11 22:51 ` Jim Blandy
2008-01-14 23:07 ` Michael Snyder
2008-01-15 17:06 ` Jim Blandy [this message]
2008-01-17 19:32 ` Rob Quill
2008-01-17 20:15 ` Jim Blandy
2008-01-17 21:11 ` Rob Quill
2008-01-17 21:58 ` Jim Blandy
2008-01-17 23:40 ` Doug Evans
2008-01-18 1:31 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-01-18 3:35 ` Rob Quill
2008-01-18 18:48 ` Jim Blandy
2008-01-18 22:43 ` Rob Quill
2008-01-19 0:38 ` Jim Blandy
2008-01-30 13:11 ` Rob Quill
2008-01-30 18:14 ` Jim Blandy
2008-01-30 18:31 ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-01-31 4:11 ` Jim Blandy
2008-01-31 7:26 ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-07-27 23:45 ` Rob Quill
2008-07-28 3:18 ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-07-28 10:31 ` Rob Quill
2008-07-28 18:27 ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-07-29 20:31 ` Tom Tromey
2008-07-29 21:04 ` Rob Quill
2008-07-29 21:45 ` Tom Tromey
2008-07-29 22:53 ` Rob Quill
2008-07-30 3:34 ` Tom Tromey
2008-10-23 13:42 ` Convenience functions (was: Re: New scope checking patch) Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-10-23 15:17 ` Convenience functions Tom Tromey
2008-10-23 15:22 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-10-23 15:26 ` Tom Tromey
2008-10-23 19:14 ` Tom Tromey
2008-10-24 12:53 ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-11-04 21:37 ` Convenience functions (was: Re: New scope checking patch) Thiago Jung Bauermann
2008-11-04 22:23 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-11-04 22:43 ` Convenience functions Tom Tromey
2008-01-31 7:52 ` New scope checking patch Michael Snyder
2008-01-19 1:35 ` Michael Snyder
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m3wsqbow7d.fsf@codesourcery.com \
--to=jimb@codesourcery.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=msnyder@specifix.com \
--cc=rob.quill@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox