From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
To: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [patch] Fix implicit pointer vs. typedefs
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 16:52:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3vcuz7gea.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110718150124.GA24706@host1.jankratochvil.net> (Jan Kratochvil's message of "Mon, 18 Jul 2011 17:01:24 +0200")
>>>>> "Jan" == Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com> writes:
Jan> found missing check_typedef in indirect_pieced_value, with the extended
Jan> testcase the fix will:
[...]
Jan> No regressions on {x86_64,x86_64-m32,i686}-fedora16pre-linux-gnu.
Jan> I will check it in if no responses appear.
Thanks Jan. It looks good to me.
I have come around to your view that we should get rid of check_typedef.
Tom
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-18 15:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-18 15:17 Jan Kratochvil
2011-07-18 16:52 ` Tom Tromey [this message]
2011-07-19 20:29 ` Jan Kratochvil
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m3vcuz7gea.fsf@fleche.redhat.com \
--to=tromey@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox