[commit] Replace additional_flags by ldflags (was Re: [PATCH] Fix ARM sign-extension on PC when using 64-bit BFD)

[Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@redhat.com>]

On Monday, April 22 2013, I wrote:

> Thanks, checked-in:
>
>         http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-cvs/2013-04/msg00213.html

Ops, what I committed was a previous version of the patch.  They're
almost the same, with the difference that instead of using
"additional_flags" the new version uses "ldflags", a change suggested by
Pedro himself.

I am sorry about the confusion, it has been fixed by the patch below.
Checked-in.

Thanks,

-- 
Sergio

--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/arm-bl-branch-dest.exp
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/arm-bl-branch-dest.exp
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ standard_testfile
 # the "-Wl,-Ttext-segment" option compile the binary.
 
 if { [prepare_for_testing ${testfile}.exp ${testfile} ${srcfile} \
-    [list debug additional_flags=-Wl,-Ttext-segment=0xb0000000]] } {
+    [list debug ldflags=-Wl,-Ttext-segment=0xb0000000]] } {
     return -1
 }