From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21721 invoked by alias); 22 Apr 2013 09:47:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 21712 invoked by uid 89); 22 Apr 2013 09:47:06 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-6.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 09:47:05 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r3M9l4pe010422 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 05:47:04 -0400 Received: from psique (ovpn-113-115.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.115]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r3M9l1wt007957 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 22 Apr 2013 05:47:02 -0400 From: Sergio Durigan Junior To: Pedro Alves Cc: GDB Patches , Andrew Haley , Tom Tromey Subject: [commit] Replace additional_flags by ldflags (was Re: [PATCH] Fix ARM sign-extension on PC when using 64-bit BFD) References: <5174FDDE.3000802@redhat.com> X-URL: http://www.redhat.com Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 15:32:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Sergio Durigan Junior's message of "Mon, 22 Apr 2013 06:21:26 -0300") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2013-04/txt/msg00661.txt.bz2 On Monday, April 22 2013, I wrote: > Thanks, checked-in: > > http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-cvs/2013-04/msg00213.html Ops, what I committed was a previous version of the patch. They're almost the same, with the difference that instead of using "additional_flags" the new version uses "ldflags", a change suggested by Pedro himself. I am sorry about the confusion, it has been fixed by the patch below. Checked-in. Thanks, -- Sergio --- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/arm-bl-branch-dest.exp +++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/arm-bl-branch-dest.exp @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ standard_testfile # the "-Wl,-Ttext-segment" option compile the binary. if { [prepare_for_testing ${testfile}.exp ${testfile} ${srcfile} \ - [list debug additional_flags=-Wl,-Ttext-segment=0xb0000000]] } { + [list debug ldflags=-Wl,-Ttext-segment=0xb0000000]] } { return -1 }