Re: RFC add "convenience functions" to gdb

[Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>]

>>>>> "Daniel" == Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org> writes:

Daniel> Hold on a bit; I promised to post my lazy strings patch for Doug and I
Daniel> have so far failed to do so.  We can use the normal string syntax, as
Daniel> long as we don't flush them out to the target unless some operation
Daniel> requires it.

Nice.  I did not even consider this idea, probably because I don't
actually know anything about gdb internals :-).  Though, I was
considering auto-coercion of host strings to target strings... which I
suppose in the end amounts to the same thing.

Anyhow, it isn't a rush for me.  I'm really just tinkering a little.

Tom