From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3639 invoked by alias); 8 Mar 2008 20:35:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 3628 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Mar 2008 20:35:11 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 08 Mar 2008 20:34:52 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m28KYknK017379 for ; Sat, 8 Mar 2008 15:34:46 -0500 Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [10.11.255.20]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m28KYkOR030068 for ; Sat, 8 Mar 2008 15:34:46 -0500 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (vpn-248-72.boston.redhat.com [10.13.248.72]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m28KYkQe021275; Sat, 8 Mar 2008 15:34:46 -0500 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id AA4013782C6; Sat, 8 Mar 2008 12:42:26 -0700 (MST) To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: RFC add "convenience functions" to gdb References: <20080308203027.GA25644@caradoc.them.org> From: Tom Tromey Reply-To: Tom Tromey X-Attribution: Tom Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2008 20:35:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20080308203027.GA25644@caradoc.them.org> (Daniel Jacobowitz's message of "Sat\, 8 Mar 2008 15\:30\:27 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-03/txt/msg00071.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Daniel" == Daniel Jacobowitz writes: Daniel> Hold on a bit; I promised to post my lazy strings patch for Doug and I Daniel> have so far failed to do so. We can use the normal string syntax, as Daniel> long as we don't flush them out to the target unless some operation Daniel> requires it. Nice. I did not even consider this idea, probably because I don't actually know anything about gdb internals :-). Though, I was considering auto-coercion of host strings to target strings... which I suppose in the end amounts to the same thing. Anyhow, it isn't a rush for me. I'm really just tinkering a little. Tom