Re: add TAGS target in testsuite

[Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>]

>>>>> "Eli" == Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:

Eli> Do bad things happen if you don't specify --language=none?

Nope.

Eli> However, wouldn't "find ... | etags ... -" be slightly better?

Sure.

Eli> IMO, it only makes sense to add this to gdb/TAGS if the additional
Eli> tags get into the GDB binary.  The test suite does not satisfy this
Eli> requirement (unlike, say, portions of Emacs implemented in Lisp).

Ok.

Michael> I use etags.  My preference would be not to.

Ok.

Here is what I am checking in.
Pierre, maybe this will work better for you; I don't know.

Tom

2011-03-07  Tom Tromey  <tromey@redhat.com>

	* Makefile.in (TAGS): Rewrite.

Index: Makefile.in
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/testsuite/Makefile.in,v
retrieving revision 1.38
diff -u -r1.38 Makefile.in
--- Makefile.in	7 Mar 2011 17:03:51 -0000	1.38
+++ Makefile.in	7 Mar 2011 22:00:51 -0000
@@ -245,5 +245,5 @@
 	$(SHELL) config.status --recheck
 
 TAGS: force
-	etags --language=none --regex='/proc[ \t]+\([^ \t]+\)/\1/' \
-	  `find $(srcdir) -name '*.exp' -print`
+	find $(srcdir) -name '*.exp' -print | \
+	    etags --regex='/proc[ \t]+\([^ \t]+\)/\1/' -