From: Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@redhat.com>
To: Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: GDB Patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>,
Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>,
Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Adjust `pc-fp.exp' for ppc64/s390x (PR 12659)
Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 03:06:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3ipd3mhue.fsf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m2wr1jbjcb.fsf@igel.home> (Andreas Schwab's message of "Wed, 01 Aug 2012 01:29:24 +0200")
On Tuesday, July 31 2012, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@redhat.com> writes:
>
>> While regtesting 7.4 against 7.5 branch on ppc64/s390x RHEL 6.3, I
>> noticed this failure. The patch which introduced this failure was
>> committed because of:
>>
>> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12659>
>> On x86*, the output of `info register pc fp' is:
>>
>> info register pc fp
>> pc: 0x400520
>> fp: 0x7fffffffc490
>> (gdb) PASS: gdb.base/pc-fp.exp: info register pc fp
>>
>> On ppc64/s390x, it is:
>>
>> info register pc fp
>> pc 0x10000658 0x10000658 <main+20>
>> fp: 0xfffffffd120
>> (gdb) FAIL: gdb.base/pc-fp.exp: info register pc fp
>
> I'm getting this:
>
> info register pc fp
> pc 0x8000042c 0x8000042c <main+4>
> fp 0xefae83e4 0xefae83e4
> (gdb) FAIL: gdb.base/pc-fp.exp: info register pc fp
This should also fail using GDB 7.5. Could you please test the
following patch?
Thanks,
--
Sergio
Index: src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/pc-fp.exp
===================================================================
--- src.orig/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/pc-fp.exp
+++ src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/pc-fp.exp
@@ -66,4 +66,4 @@ gdb_test "info register \$fp" "${valueof
# Regression test for
# http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12659
gdb_test "info register pc fp" \
- "pc: ${valueof_pc}\[\r\n\]+fp: ${valueof_fp}\[\r\n\]+"
+ "pc(:)?( |\t)+${valueof_pc}(( |\t)+${valueof_pc} <.*>)?\[\r\n\]+fp(:)?( |\t)+${valueof_fp}(( |\t)+${valueof_fp})?\[\r\n\]+"
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-01 3:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-31 21:26 Sergio Durigan Junior
2012-07-31 23:29 ` Andreas Schwab
2012-08-01 3:06 ` Sergio Durigan Junior [this message]
2012-08-01 9:22 ` Andreas Schwab
2012-08-01 8:46 ` Pedro Alves
2012-08-01 19:41 ` Ulrich Weigand
2012-08-01 19:47 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2012-08-01 20:20 ` info registers output Pedro Alves
2012-08-01 20:49 ` Ulrich Weigand
2012-08-01 20:55 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2012-08-27 17:41 ` Pedro Alves
2012-08-28 0:41 ` Ulrich Weigand
2012-08-28 9:07 ` Pedro Alves
2012-08-01 19:52 ` [PATCH] Adjust `pc-fp.exp' for ppc64/s390x (PR 12659) Tom Tromey
2012-08-01 20:23 ` Pedro Alves
2012-08-01 20:49 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2012-08-01 21:44 ` Pedro Alves
2012-08-01 22:03 ` Andreas Schwab
2012-08-01 23:40 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2012-08-02 9:06 ` Pedro Alves
2012-08-02 20:38 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2012-08-08 11:57 ` Mark Kettenis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m3ipd3mhue.fsf@redhat.com \
--to=sergiodj@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
--cc=schwab@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=tromey@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox