From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8009 invoked by alias); 1 Aug 2012 03:06:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 7995 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Aug 2012 03:06:42 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,SPF_HELO_PASS,TW_XF,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Aug 2012 03:06:27 +0000 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q7136OWK002379 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 31 Jul 2012 23:06:24 -0400 Received: from psique (ovpn-113-52.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.52]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q7136If1026128; Tue, 31 Jul 2012 23:06:19 -0400 From: Sergio Durigan Junior To: Andreas Schwab Cc: GDB Patches , Tom Tromey , Jan Kratochvil Subject: Re: [PATCH] Adjust `pc-fp.exp' for ppc64/s390x (PR 12659) References: X-URL: http://www.redhat.com Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 03:06:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Andreas Schwab's message of "Wed, 01 Aug 2012 01:29:24 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-08/txt/msg00000.txt.bz2 On Tuesday, July 31 2012, Andreas Schwab wrote: > Sergio Durigan Junior writes: > >> While regtesting 7.4 against 7.5 branch on ppc64/s390x RHEL 6.3, I >> noticed this failure. The patch which introduced this failure was >> committed because of: >> >> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12659> >> On x86*, the output of `info register pc fp' is: >> >> info register pc fp >> pc: 0x400520 >> fp: 0x7fffffffc490 >> (gdb) PASS: gdb.base/pc-fp.exp: info register pc fp >> >> On ppc64/s390x, it is: >> >> info register pc fp >> pc 0x10000658 0x10000658 >> fp: 0xfffffffd120 >> (gdb) FAIL: gdb.base/pc-fp.exp: info register pc fp > > I'm getting this: > > info register pc fp > pc 0x8000042c 0x8000042c > fp 0xefae83e4 0xefae83e4 > (gdb) FAIL: gdb.base/pc-fp.exp: info register pc fp This should also fail using GDB 7.5. Could you please test the following patch? Thanks, -- Sergio Index: src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/pc-fp.exp =================================================================== --- src.orig/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/pc-fp.exp +++ src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/pc-fp.exp @@ -66,4 +66,4 @@ gdb_test "info register \$fp" "${valueof # Regression test for # http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12659 gdb_test "info register pc fp" \ - "pc: ${valueof_pc}\[\r\n\]+fp: ${valueof_fp}\[\r\n\]+" + "pc(:)?( |\t)+${valueof_pc}(( |\t)+${valueof_pc} <.*>)?\[\r\n\]+fp(:)?( |\t)+${valueof_fp}(( |\t)+${valueof_fp})?\[\r\n\]+"