Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
To: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>,
	       hjl@gnu.org
Subject: Re: RFC: partially available registers
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 18:25:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3d3gv8vuj.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201107261631.18672.pedro@codesourcery.com> (Pedro Alves's	message of "Tue, 26 Jul 2011 16:31:18 +0100")

>>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com> writes:

Pedro> <unavailable> means the object exists, and its value exists,
Pedro> but we have no means to fetch it.

[...]

After re-reading this reply a couple of times and thinking about the
issue, I think you are right, and we should supply 0 instead of
<unavailable> here.

Tom> If you agree with what I have checked in, I will update gdbserver.

Pedro> I think your patch implements the right interface for partial
Pedro> registers support.  I like it...

Great.

Pedro> ... but I think that we should go with 0, instead of <unavailable>,
Pedro> meaning changing x87-tdep.c:i387_supply_xsave to supply
Pedro> explicity zeroed buffer, instead of a NULL pointer, like
Pedro> gdbserver does.

I will do this.

Tom


  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-07-27 17:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-07-13 20:17 Tom Tromey
2011-07-14  4:24 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2011-07-15 20:52   ` Tom Tromey
2011-07-18  4:15     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2011-07-20 20:14       ` Pedro Alves
2011-07-20 18:49     ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2011-07-20 20:46     ` Tom Tromey
2011-07-20 20:53       ` Tom Tromey
2011-07-24 13:48         ` Mark Kettenis
2011-07-25 15:50           ` Tom Tromey
2011-07-21  5:23       ` Ulrich Weigand
2011-07-21 20:27         ` Tom Tromey
2011-07-22 13:48           ` Ulrich Weigand
2011-07-22 15:42             ` Tom Tromey
2011-07-22 14:30       ` Pedro Alves
2011-07-22 15:40         ` Tom Tromey
2011-07-22 19:10           ` Pedro Alves
2011-07-22 19:19             ` Tom Tromey
2011-07-22 19:31               ` Pedro Alves
2011-07-22 21:58                 ` Pedro Alves
2011-07-22 22:20                 ` Tom Tromey
2011-07-26 17:08                   ` Pedro Alves
2011-07-26 17:13                     ` Pedro Alves
2011-07-26 19:46                       ` Tom Tromey
2011-07-27 18:25                     ` Tom Tromey [this message]
2011-07-27 19:30                       ` Tom Tromey
2011-07-27 19:33                         ` Pedro Alves
2011-07-28  5:19                         ` Mark Kettenis

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=m3d3gv8vuj.fsf@fleche.redhat.com \
    --to=tromey@redhat.com \
    --cc=drow@false.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=hjl@gnu.org \
    --cc=pedro@codesourcery.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox