* Re: [Fwd: Fix arm_addr_bits_remove: 26-bit Thumb doesn't exist]
[not found] <3BD301F6.D679AB69@redhat.com>
@ 2001-10-22 3:00 ` Nick Clifton
2001-10-22 6:18 ` Fernando Nasser
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Nick Clifton @ 2001-10-22 3:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ben Harris, Fernando Nasser; +Cc: gdb-patches
Hi Fernando, Hi Ben,
> From: Ben Harris <bjh21@netbsd.org>
>
> I haven't actually encountered this bug in reality yet, but it looks
> to me as if arm_addr_bits_remove() is bogus. Specifically, it has a
> case for Thumb state in a 26-bit mode. According to the ARM ARM
> (2nd Edition, section A8.1), no processor will support both 26-bit
> mode and thumb state at all, let alone at the same time. I suspect
> this might be a noticeable problem when debugging SVC mode code,
> since then R15 will have its bottom bit set, which arm_pc_is_thumb()
> is likely to interpret as meaning the CPU is in Thumb state.
>
> ChangeLog entry:
>
> 2001-10-20 Ben Harris <bjh21@netbsd.org>
>
> * arm-tdep.c (arm_addr_bits_remove): Don't believe in 26-bit
> Thumb.
This looks like a reasonable patch to me. I do not have the authority
to approve it, but I would certainly recommend it to the GDB
maintainers.
Cheers
Nick
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [Fwd: Fix arm_addr_bits_remove: 26-bit Thumb doesn't exist]
2001-10-22 3:00 ` [Fwd: Fix arm_addr_bits_remove: 26-bit Thumb doesn't exist] Nick Clifton
@ 2001-10-22 6:18 ` Fernando Nasser
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Fernando Nasser @ 2001-10-22 6:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nick Clifton; +Cc: Ben Harris, gdb-patches, Richard.Earnshaw
Thank you Nick and Richard.
I haven't heard anything on the contrary from Scott (native ARM)
so I will check this in later today or tomorrow.
Thanks for the patch Ben.
Regards to all,
Fernando
Nick Clifton wrote:
>
> Hi Fernando, Hi Ben,
>
> > From: Ben Harris <bjh21@netbsd.org>
> >
> > I haven't actually encountered this bug in reality yet, but it looks
> > to me as if arm_addr_bits_remove() is bogus. Specifically, it has a
> > case for Thumb state in a 26-bit mode. According to the ARM ARM
> > (2nd Edition, section A8.1), no processor will support both 26-bit
> > mode and thumb state at all, let alone at the same time. I suspect
> > this might be a noticeable problem when debugging SVC mode code,
> > since then R15 will have its bottom bit set, which arm_pc_is_thumb()
> > is likely to interpret as meaning the CPU is in Thumb state.
> >
> > ChangeLog entry:
> >
> > 2001-10-20 Ben Harris <bjh21@netbsd.org>
> >
> > * arm-tdep.c (arm_addr_bits_remove): Don't believe in 26-bit
> > Thumb.
>
> This looks like a reasonable patch to me. I do not have the authority
> to approve it, but I would certainly recommend it to the GDB
> maintainers.
>
> Cheers
> Nick
--
Fernando Nasser
Red Hat Canada Ltd. E-Mail: fnasser@redhat.com
2323 Yonge Street, Suite #300
Toronto, Ontario M4P 2C9
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2001-10-22 6:18 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <3BD301F6.D679AB69@redhat.com>
2001-10-22 3:00 ` [Fwd: Fix arm_addr_bits_remove: 26-bit Thumb doesn't exist] Nick Clifton
2001-10-22 6:18 ` Fernando Nasser
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox