* [patch] testsuite: Remove KFAILs for c++/11702
@ 2010-06-29 21:14 Jan Kratochvil
2010-06-30 15:35 ` Tom Tromey
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jan Kratochvil @ 2010-06-29 21:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-patches
Hi,
now that c++/11702 is fixed I believe we should remove its KFAILs.
Tested on x86_64-fedora13-linux-gnu on updates,{-testing} and with GCC HEAD.
Probably obvious but asking for approval.
Thanks,
Jan
2010-06-29 Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
* gdb.cp/namespace.exp (print C::OtherFileClass::cOtherFileClassVar)
(print ::C::OtherFileClass::cOtherFileClassVar): Remove KFAIL for
c++/11702.
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/namespace.exp
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/namespace.exp
@@ -186,17 +186,7 @@ if {[test_compiler_info {gcc-[0-3]-*}]
setup_xfail *-*-*
}
gdb_test "whatis ::C::OtherFileClass::cOtherFileClassType" "type = short"
-
-set test "print C::OtherFileClass::cOtherFileClassVar"
-gdb_test_multiple $test $test {
- -re "\\$\[0-9\].* = 318\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
- pass $test
- }
- -re "static field cOtherFileClassVar has been optimized out\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
- setup_kfail "c++/11702" "*-*-*"
- fail $test
- }
-}
+gdb_test "print C::OtherFileClass::cOtherFileClassVar" " = 318"
# FSF GCC <=4.4 creates unqualified DIE "cOtherFileClassVar" ignoring the
# namespace the same way older GDB did.
@@ -206,16 +196,7 @@ gdb_test_multiple $test $test {
-re "No symbol \"cOtherFileClassVar\" in current context\\.\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
pass $test
- gdb_test_multiple $test2 $test2 {
- -re "\\$\[0-9\].* = 318\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
- pass $test2
- }
- -re "static field cOtherFileClassVar has been optimized out\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
- setup_kfail "c++/11702" "*-*-*"
- fail $test2
- }
- }
-
+ gdb_test $test2 " = 318"
}
-re "\\$\[0-9\].* = 318\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
if {[test_compiler_info {gcc-[0-3]-*}]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch] testsuite: Remove KFAILs for c++/11702
2010-06-29 21:14 [patch] testsuite: Remove KFAILs for c++/11702 Jan Kratochvil
@ 2010-06-30 15:35 ` Tom Tromey
2010-06-30 15:59 ` Jan Kratochvil
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Tom Tromey @ 2010-06-30 15:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jan Kratochvil; +Cc: gdb-patches
>>>>> "Jan" == Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com> writes:
Jan> now that c++/11702 is fixed I believe we should remove its KFAILs.
Jan> Tested on x86_64-fedora13-linux-gnu on updates,{-testing} and with
Jan> GCC HEAD.
Jan> Probably obvious but asking for approval.
Ok.
Tom
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch] testsuite: Remove KFAILs for c++/11702
2010-06-30 15:35 ` Tom Tromey
@ 2010-06-30 15:59 ` Jan Kratochvil
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jan Kratochvil @ 2010-06-30 15:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tom Tromey; +Cc: gdb-patches
On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 17:35:27 +0200, Tom Tromey wrote:
> Ok.
Checked-in:
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-cvs/2010-06/msg00213.html
Thanks,
Jan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-06-30 15:59 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-06-29 21:14 [patch] testsuite: Remove KFAILs for c++/11702 Jan Kratochvil
2010-06-30 15:35 ` Tom Tromey
2010-06-30 15:59 ` Jan Kratochvil
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox