From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
To: Ali Lakhia <lakhia@alumni.utexas.net>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [patch] Memory leak fixes
Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2010 22:47:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m37hhws1e5.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=gYU1ix8_8G3Ens28=XmZxwuQ+=pqGqfrmM+-T@mail.gmail.com> (Ali Lakhia's message of "Fri, 1 Oct 2010 17:16:02 -0700")
>>>>> "Ali" == Ali Lakhia <lakhia@alumni.utexas.net> writes:
Ali> Please see fixes for memory leaks. My testing for these has been
Ali> limited to just making sure things work for my day-to-day use. Thanks,
In addition to what Joel said, I have a couple notes on the patch itself.q
Ali> diff -ru gdb-7.1/gdb/dwarf2read.c gdb-7.1/gdb/dwarf2read.c
Ali> --- gdb-7.1/gdb/dwarf2read.c 2010-09-14 16:59:40.000000000 -0700
Ali> +++ gdb-7.1/gdb/dwarf2read.c 2010-06-15 14:53:54.000000000 -0700
Ali> @@ -5462,6 +5462,7 @@
Ali> set_descriptive_type (type, die, cu);
Ali> do_cleanups (back_to);
Ali> + xfree (range_types);
This one seems to be fixed in CVS.
There is a cleanup covering range_types.
Actually, I see this cleanup in 7.1 as well.
How did you find this leak?
Maybe the logic around creating the cleanup is wrong.
Ali> diff -ru gdb-7.1/gdb/printcmd.c gdb-7.1/gdb/printcmd.c
Ali> --- gdb-7.1/gdb/printcmd.c 2010-09-14 17:03:28.000000000 -0700
Ali> +++ gdb-7.1/gdb/printcmd.c 2010-06-15 14:53:54.000000000 -0700
Ali> @@ -608,6 +608,7 @@
Ali> fputs_filtered (">", stream);
Ali> do_cleanups (cleanup_chain);
Ali> + xfree (filename);
Ali> }
This one is also covered by a cleanup.
Ali> diff -ru gdb-7.1/gdb/python/py-type.c gdb-7.1/gdb/python/py-type.c
Ali> --- gdb-7.1/gdb/python/py-type.c 2010-09-14 17:03:28.000000000 -0700
Ali> +++ gdb-7.1/gdb/python/py-type.c 2010-06-14 14:04:28.000000000 -0700
Ali> @@ -580,6 +580,7 @@
Ali> type_print (type_object_to_type (self), "", stb, -1);
Ali> + xfree (thetype);
Ali> thetype = ui_file_xstrdup (stb, &length);
Ali> do_cleanups (old_chain);
I didn't check this one, but if you want to insert a free before a call
to do_cleanups, usually that means you should create a cleanup at the
point of allocation.
Tom
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-05 22:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-02 0:16 Ali Lakhia
2010-10-02 0:57 ` Joel Brobecker
2010-10-05 22:47 ` Tom Tromey [this message]
2010-10-05 23:47 ` Ali Lakhia
2010-10-06 16:19 ` Tom Tromey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m37hhws1e5.fsf@fleche.redhat.com \
--to=tromey@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=lakhia@alumni.utexas.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox