From: Doug Evans <xdje42@gmail.com>
To: "Pierre Muller" <pierre.muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr>
Cc: <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] Remove struct main_type.vptr_{fieldno,basetype}: TYPE_SPECIFIC_SELF_TYPE
Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2015 07:21:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m31tm3ld5g.fsf@sspiff.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54d3aa46.0660b40a.14f0.ffffeae7SMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com> (Pierre Muller's message of "Thu, 5 Feb 2015 18:37:00 +0100")
"Pierre Muller" <pierre.muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr> writes:
> Hi all,
>
>
>> -----Message d'origine-----
>> De : gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org [mailto:gdb-patches-
>> owner@sourceware.org] De la part de Doug Evans
>> Envoyé : lundi 26 janvier 2015 01:07
>> À : gdb-patches@sourceware.org; gaius@glam.ac.uk
>> Objet : [PATCH 4/5] Remove struct main_type.vptr_{fieldno,basetype}:
>> TYPE_SPECIFIC_SELF_TYPE
>>
>> Hi.
>>
>> This patch moves TYPE_SELF_TYPE into new field type_specific.self_type
>> for MEMBERPTR,METHODPTR types, and into type_specific.func_stuff
>> for METHODs, and then updates everything to use that.
>> TYPE_CODE_METHOD could share some things with TYPE_CODE_FUNC
>> (e.g. TYPE_NO_RETURN) and it seemed simplest to keep them together.
>>
>> Moving TYPE_SELF_TYPE into type_specific.func_stuff for
>> TYPE_CODE_METHOD
>> is also nice because when we allocate space for function types we
>> assume
>> they're TYPE_CODE_FUNCs. If TYPE_CODE_METHODs don't need or use that
>> space then that space would be wasted, and cleaning that up would
>> involve
>> more invasive changes.
>>
>> In order to catch errant uses I've added accessor functions
>> that do some checking.
>>
>> One can no longer assign to TYPE_SELF_TYPE like this:
>>
>> TYPE_SELF_TYPE (foo) = bar;
>>
>> One instead has to do:
>>
>> set_type_self_type (foo, bar);
>>
>> But I've left reading of the type to the macro:
>>
>> bar = TYPE_SELF_TYPE (foo);
>>
>> I could add SET_TYPE_SELF_TYPE as a wrapper on set_type_self_type
>> if you prefer that.
>>
>> In order to discourage bypassing the TYPE_SELF_TYPE macro
>> I've named the underlying function that implements it
> ....
>> * stabsread.c (read_member_functions): Mark methods with
>> TYPE_CODE_METHOD, not TYPE_CODE_FUNC. Update setting of
>> TYPE_SELF_TYPE.
> .....
>> diff --git a/gdb/stabsread.c b/gdb/stabsread.c
>> index 1f46f75..423c442 100644
>> --- a/gdb/stabsread.c
>> +++ b/gdb/stabsread.c
>> @@ -2376,14 +2376,21 @@ read_member_functions (struct field_info *fip,
>> char **pp, struct type *type,
>> p++;
>> }
>>
>> - /* If this is just a stub, then we don't have the real name
>> here. */
>> + /* These are methods, not functions. */
>> + if (TYPE_CODE (new_sublist->fn_field.type) == TYPE_CODE_FUNC)
>> + TYPE_CODE (new_sublist->fn_field.type) = TYPE_CODE_METHOD;
>> + else
>> + gdb_assert (TYPE_CODE (new_sublist->fn_field.type)
>> + == TYPE_CODE_METHOD);
>>
>> + /* If this is just a stub, then we don't have the real name
>> here. */
>> if (TYPE_STUB (new_sublist->fn_field.type))
>> {
>> if (!TYPE_SELF_TYPE (new_sublist->fn_field.type))
> I suspect this is the part that generates the failure
> I saw when trying to test my pascal patch that used stabs debugging
> information.
>
> internal_type_self_type generates an internal error
> it does not simply return NULL...
Hi.
Is it easy/possible to send me a repro?
Even just the binary that triggers the problem would help.
It would be good to verify what's going on here.
If internal_type_self_type got an internal error it must be this one:
gdb_assert (TYPE_SPECIFIC_FIELD (type) == TYPE_SPECIFIC_FUNC);
But it's hard to see how that would fail given the earlier check
for TYPE_CODE_FUNC:
if (TYPE_CODE (new_sublist->fn_field.type) == TYPE_CODE_FUNC)
TYPE_CODE (new_sublist->fn_field.type) = TYPE_CODE_METHOD;
else
gdb_assert (TYPE_CODE (new_sublist->fn_field.type)
== TYPE_CODE_METHOD);
I'm not sure how we'd get here with anything other than TYPE_CODE_FUNC
but for robustness I added the assert for TYPE_CODE_METHOD.
And if we've got a TYPE_CODE_FUNC then AFAICT that means we've called
make_function_type which sets TYPE_SPECIFIC_FIELD (type) = TYPE_SPECIFIC_FUNC.
Ergo IWBN to reproduce this and see the details.
I'm not saying there isn't a problem of course,
just that I may need some help understanding it.
Also, why couldn't internal_type_self_type return NULL?
>> - TYPE_SELF_TYPE (new_sublist->fn_field.type) = type;
>> + set_type_self_type (new_sublist->fn_field.type, type);
>> new_sublist->fn_field.is_stub = 1;
>> }
>> +
>> new_sublist->fn_field.physname = savestring (*pp, p - *pp);
>> *pp = p + 1;
>
> The patch below removes the internal error,
> but I am not sure it is the correct fix...
> Maybe set_type_self_type should be called unconditionally.
>
> Likewise, the line:
> valops.c:2547: gdb_assert (TYPE_SELF_TYPE (fns_ptr[0].type) != NULL);
> is not compatible with your new internal_type_self_type as this
> new function never returns NULL....
>
>
> Pierre Muller
>
> $ git diff
> diff --git a/gdb/stabsread.c b/gdb/stabsread.c
> index 2a160c5..392fdb2 100644
> --- a/gdb/stabsread.c
> +++ b/gdb/stabsread.c
> @@ -2386,7 +2386,7 @@ read_member_functions (struct field_info *fip, char
> **pp, struct type *type,
> /* If this is just a stub, then we don't have the real name here.
> */
> if (TYPE_STUB (new_sublist->fn_field.type))
> {
> - if (!TYPE_SELF_TYPE (new_sublist->fn_field.type))
> + if (TYPE_SPECIFIC_FIELD (new_sublist->fn_field.type) ==
> TYPE_SPECIFIC_NONE)
> set_type_self_type (new_sublist->fn_field.type, type);
> new_sublist->fn_field.is_stub = 1;
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-06 7:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-26 7:29 Doug Evans
2015-02-05 17:37 ` Pierre Muller
[not found] ` <54d3aa46.0660b40a.14f0.ffffeae7SMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com>
2015-02-06 7:21 ` Doug Evans [this message]
2015-02-07 17:47 ` Pierre Muller
[not found] ` <54d3aa6b.a23d460a.0d37.0908SMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com>
2015-02-07 23:06 ` Doug Evans
2015-02-08 14:48 ` Pierre Muller
[not found] ` <54d7775a.2b2c460a.5b38.7725SMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com>
2015-02-11 6:28 ` Doug Evans
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m31tm3ld5g.fsf@sspiff.org \
--to=xdje42@gmail.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=pierre.muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox