From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: Testsuite failures in gdb.base/callfuncs.exp
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:56:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <je3b5r9u67.fsf@sykes.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070131124926.GA18380@nevyn.them.org> (Daniel Jacobowitz's message of "Wed, 31 Jan 2007 07:49:26 -0500")
Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org> writes:
> On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 01:33:26PM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>> This fixes these testsuite failures on ia64:
>>
>> FAIL: gdb.base/callfuncs.exp: gdb function calls preserve register contents
>> FAIL: gdb.base/callfuncs.exp: continue after stop in call dummy preserves register contents
>> FAIL: gdb.base/callfuncs.exp: return after stop in call dummy preserves register contents
>>
>> The problem is that the bspstore register is specially tied with the bsp
>> register, and this can't be controlled by gdb.
>
> How does this work - i.e. how do we guarantee that the restored state
> is equivalent? Does it indicate extra registers written to the
> register stack?
bsp can only be modified by writing to bspstore, which is what the kernel
does behind our back. gdb itself never writes to bspstore. Thus the
value of bspstore does not really matter.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE Linux Products GmbH, MaxfeldstraÃe 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
PGP key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-01-31 13:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-01-31 12:33 Andreas Schwab
2007-01-31 12:49 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-01-31 13:56 ` Andreas Schwab [this message]
2007-01-31 14:15 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-01-31 14:57 ` Andreas Schwab
2007-01-31 15:10 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-01-31 15:35 ` Andreas Schwab
2007-01-31 15:40 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-02-01 22:53 ` Mark Kettenis
2007-02-01 23:29 ` Andreas Schwab
2007-02-08 17:03 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=je3b5r9u67.fsf@sykes.suse.de \
--to=schwab@suse.de \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox