From: Doug Evans <dje@google.com>
To: tromey@redhat.com
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [RFA] [1/2] auto-loading scripts from .debug_gdb_scripts section
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 21:38:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <h2qe394668d1004201438u54e94269p8f6589a2ba8dfd42@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m3tyr6ey3p.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 12:13 PM, Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>>> "Doug" == Doug Evans <dje@google.com> writes:
>
> Doug> This patch adds support for auto-loading scripts mentioned in
> Doug> section .debug_gdb_scripts.
>
> It seems reasonable to me. I looked through the patch and didn't see
> anything I disagreed with.
Great.
> I'm curious why these new scripts are attached to the program space and
> not just the objfile from which the section came. But, I don't think it
> really matters.
In the case of multiple scripts each being defined in multiple
objfiles, I wanted to minimize the accumulated number of scripts one
had to deal with (there could be *lots* of duplicates). Once one does
that one can't attach scripts to objfiles because one doesn't
necessarily want the script to go away if the objfile goes away. I
had a patch that reference counted them, but it seemed excessive for
now so I abandoned it.
> I'm somewhat concerned about security. I don't know why I didn't think
> of this before :-(. The issue is that either approach can result in
> random Python code being loaded into gdb.
>
> One idea for a fix would be to check the script file's ownership and
> permissions before reading it. I think we'd need to allow files to be
> owned by the current user or by root in order for this to work nicely in
> the distro case.
That's probably the right default choice, but I can imagine wanting
more flexibility.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-20 21:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-16 7:06 Doug Evans
2010-04-16 9:38 ` Eli Zaretskii
2010-04-16 18:06 ` Doug Evans
2010-04-16 21:25 ` Eli Zaretskii
2010-04-20 21:45 ` Doug Evans
2010-04-21 19:23 ` Doug Evans
2010-04-21 20:39 ` Eli Zaretskii
2010-04-21 21:54 ` Doug Evans
2010-04-22 3:13 ` Eli Zaretskii
2010-04-23 18:10 ` Doug Evans
2010-04-20 19:13 ` Tom Tromey
2010-04-20 21:38 ` Doug Evans [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=h2qe394668d1004201438u54e94269p8f6589a2ba8dfd42@mail.gmail.com \
--to=dje@google.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=tromey@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox