From: Vladimir Prus <ghost@cs.msu.su>
To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [BUG:MI] -break-list doesn't list multiple breakpoints
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 07:32:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fnp8jj$hl3$1@ger.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <18336.7948.316240.708346@kahikatea.snap.net.nz>
Nick Roberts wrote:
> > > > > > As an alternative, I guess this line alone could be removed so
> > > > > > that -break-insert lists the multiple breakpoint locations
> > > > > > being set and the adjust MI documentation to explain this.
> > > > >
> > > > > We should check what the new MI output looks like, and see if it
> > > > > breaks Emacs / Eclipse / Kdevelop. It might be that easy.
> > > >
> > > > It won't break Emacs becuase it doesn't use the output of
> > > > -break-insert.
> > >
> > > If the new output from -break-list works OK, that is.
> >
> > It would be nice to actually *see* the examples of that new output ;-)
> > My theory (and why I did not implemented that for MI), is that
> > frontends will start showing breakpoint locations as if they were
> > individual breakpoint which is likely will fail. To begin with, if
> > frontend uses integer to represent breakpoint id, then "1.1" location
> > id won't be representable.
>
> The manual doesn't state that the breakpoint number will be a integer.
The manual fails to state lots of things, so frontend naturally make various
assumptions.
> Without the file and line information, the frontend can't display
> breakpoint icons or display the relevant source in a window, which must be
> worse.
Given that such a change has a potential to totally break frontend,
I'm not sure we can talk in the abstract. If you send me the most
recent version of your patch, I can see if KDevelop will be happy,
or not.
- Volodya
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-30 7:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-10 22:08 Nick Roberts
2008-01-11 17:36 ` Vladimir Prus
2008-01-11 21:34 ` Nick Roberts
2008-01-11 22:55 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-01-11 23:38 ` Nick Roberts
2008-01-15 17:08 ` Vladimir Prus
2008-01-15 21:38 ` Nick Roberts
2008-01-13 21:26 ` Nick Roberts
2008-01-29 19:16 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-01-29 22:53 ` Nick Roberts
2008-01-29 23:31 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-01-30 0:52 ` Nick Roberts
2008-01-30 3:04 ` Nick Roberts
2008-01-30 3:20 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-01-30 5:59 ` Vladimir Prus
2008-01-30 7:14 ` Nick Roberts
2008-01-30 7:32 ` Vladimir Prus [this message]
2008-01-30 7:50 ` Nick Roberts
2008-01-30 7:58 ` Vladimir Prus
2008-02-01 20:15 ` Marc Khouzam
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='fnp8jj$hl3$1@ger.gmane.org' \
--to=ghost@cs.msu.su \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox