From: Pedro Alves <pedro@palves.net>
To: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>, Lancelot SIX <Lancelot.Six@amd.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/11] gdb: Use std::string_view instead of gdb::string_view
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2023 22:51:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fb5aa9ae-a80b-4206-a180-3ad9d4e9e764@palves.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87zg0iqs1p.fsf@tromey.com>
On 2023-10-16 20:35, Tom Tromey wrote:
>>>>>> "Lancelot" == Lancelot SIX <Lancelot.Six@amd.com> writes:
>
> Lancelot> + std::string_view name;
> Lancelot> + if (const char *name_str = keyname (ch);
> Lancelot> + name_str != nullptr)
>
> We should probably discuss whether to allow this construct before
> letting it in.
>
> Personally I'm ok with it.
I think it may look a little weird if you're not used to it (like I am not), but
OTOH it isn't really different from introducing a variable to scope with "for", like:
for (const char *name_str = keyname (ch);
name_str != nullptr; ....)
....
so I suspect we'll all just get used to it and think nothing of it in a few years.
So am I fine with it too.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-16 21:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-13 14:44 [PATCH 00/11] GDB: Require C++17 Lancelot Six
2023-10-13 14:44 ` [PATCH 01/11] gdb/ax_cxx_compile_stdcxx.m4: upgrade Lancelot Six
2023-10-13 14:44 ` [PATCH 02/11] gdb/gdbsupport/gdbserver: Require c++17 Lancelot Six
2023-10-13 15:21 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-10-16 21:50 ` Pedro Alves
2023-10-13 14:44 ` [PATCH 03/11] gdb: Use C++17's std::make_unique instead of gdb::make_unique Lancelot Six
2023-10-16 19:14 ` Tom Tromey
2023-10-17 14:02 ` Lancelot SIX
2023-10-13 14:44 ` [PATCH 04/11] gdb: Replace gdb::optional with std::optional Lancelot Six
2023-10-13 14:44 ` [PATCH 05/11] gdbsupport: remove gdb::optional Lancelot Six
2023-10-13 14:44 ` [PATCH 06/11] gdb: Use std::string_view instead of gdb::string_view Lancelot Six
2023-10-14 21:50 ` Tom Tromey
2023-10-14 23:58 ` Six, Lancelot
2023-10-16 15:06 ` Lancelot SIX
2023-10-16 19:35 ` Tom Tromey
2023-10-16 21:51 ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2023-10-17 14:13 ` Lancelot SIX
2023-10-17 14:20 ` Simon Marchi
2023-10-13 14:44 ` [PATCH 07/11] gdb: Remove uses of gdb::to_string (const std::string_view &) Lancelot Six
2023-10-13 14:44 ` [PATCH 08/11] gdbsupport: Remove gdb::string_view Lancelot Six
2023-10-16 19:38 ` Tom Tromey
2023-10-13 14:44 ` [PATCH 09/11] gdbsupport: Replace gdb::invoke_result with std::invoke_result Lancelot Six
2023-10-13 14:44 ` [PATCH 10/11] gdb/disasm.h: Mark callbacks noexcept unconditionally Lancelot Six
2023-10-16 21:51 ` Pedro Alves
2023-10-13 14:44 ` [PATCH 11/11] gdb: Use initializers in lambda captures unconditionally Lancelot Six
2023-10-16 19:43 ` [PATCH 00/11] GDB: Require C++17 Tom Tromey
2023-10-16 21:53 ` Pedro Alves
2023-10-23 13:42 ` Lancelot SIX
2023-10-28 20:48 ` Lancelot SIX
2023-11-21 12:04 ` [COMMITTED PATCH v2 0/9] " Lancelot Six
2023-11-21 12:04 ` [COMMITTED PATCH v2 1/9] gdb: Use C++17's std::make_unique instead of gdb::make_unique Lancelot Six
2023-11-21 12:04 ` [COMMITTED PATCH v2 2/9] gdb: Replace gdb::optional with std::optional Lancelot Six
2023-11-21 12:04 ` [COMMITTED PATCH v2 3/9] gdbsupport: remove gdb::optional Lancelot Six
2023-11-21 12:04 ` [COMMITTED PATCH v2 4/9] gdb: Use std::string_view instead of gdb::string_view Lancelot Six
2023-11-21 12:04 ` [COMMITTED PATCH v2 5/9] gdb: Remove uses of gdb::to_string (const std::string_view &) Lancelot Six
2023-11-21 12:04 ` [COMMITTED PATCH v2 6/9] gdbsupport: Remove gdb::string_view Lancelot Six
2023-11-21 12:04 ` [COMMITTED PATCH v2 7/9] gdbsupport: Replace gdb::invoke_result with std::invoke_result Lancelot Six
2023-11-21 12:04 ` [COMMITTED PATCH v2 8/9] gdb/disasm.h: Mark callbacks noexcept unconditionally Lancelot Six
2023-11-21 12:05 ` [COMMITTED PATCH v2 9/9] gdb: Use initializers in lambda captures unconditionally Lancelot Six
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fb5aa9ae-a80b-4206-a180-3ad9d4e9e764@palves.net \
--to=pedro@palves.net \
--cc=Lancelot.Six@amd.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=tom@tromey.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox