From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
To: Don Breazeal <donb@codesourcery.com>,
"gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>,
"qiyaoltc@gmail.com" <qiyaoltc@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Optimize memory_xfer_partial for remote
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2016 18:40:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f8f1b585-3324-b5a0-183d-1e54116d0505@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <57755AC2.9090008@codesourcery.com>
On 06/30/2016 06:45 PM, Don Breazeal wrote:
> That makes sense to me. If it returns ULONGEST_MAX then the rest of the
> patch can stay as-is. Something like this?
>
> +/* The default implementation for the to_get_memory_xfer_limit method.
> + The default limit is essentially "no limit". */
> +
> +static ULONGEST
> +default_get_memory_xfer_limit (struct target_ops *self)
> +{
> + return ULONGEST_MAX;
> +}
Agreed. Though if you use TARGET_DEFAULT_RETURN, then you don't
even need that function:
/* Return the limit on the size of any single memory transfer
for the target. The default limit is essentially "no limit". */
ULONGEST (*to_get_memory_xfer_limit) (struct target_ops *)
TARGET_DEFAULT_RETURN (ULONGEST_MAX);
Thanks,
Pedro Alves
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-30 18:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-03 19:02 [PATCH] " Don Breazeal
2016-06-20 15:31 ` [PING] " Don Breazeal
2016-06-20 19:25 ` Pedro Alves
2016-06-21 10:15 ` Yao Qi
2016-06-24 21:21 ` [PATCH v2] " Don Breazeal
2016-06-24 22:23 ` Pedro Alves
2016-06-27 20:23 ` Don Breazeal
2016-06-30 17:06 ` Pedro Alves
2016-06-30 17:45 ` Don Breazeal
2016-06-30 18:40 ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2016-06-30 22:40 ` [PATCH v3] " Don Breazeal
2016-06-30 23:44 ` Pedro Alves
2016-07-01 18:24 ` [pushed] " Don Breazeal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f8f1b585-3324-b5a0-183d-1e54116d0505@redhat.com \
--to=palves@redhat.com \
--cc=donb@codesourcery.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=qiyaoltc@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox