Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom de Vries via Gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
To: Lancelot SIX <lancelot.six@amd.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Cc: lsix@lancelotsix.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] gdb/varobj: Only re-evaluate invalid globals during re_set
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2022 12:55:56 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f7b3e95e-5751-f52f-59d2-9fc73efe8986@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220804130231.2126565-4-lancelot.six@amd.com>

On 8/4/22 15:02, Lancelot SIX wrote:
> When doing varobj_re_set, we currently try to recreate floating varobj.
> This was introduced by 4e969b4f0128 "Re-evaluate floating varobj as part
> of varobj_invalidate" to deal with use a after free issue.  However
> since bc20e562ec0 "Fix use after free in varobj" we now ensure that we
> never have dangling pointers so this all recreation is not strictly
> needed anymore for floating varobjs.
> 
> This commit proposes to remove this recreation process for floating
> varobjs.
> 
> Tested on x86_64-linux.

LGTM.

Thanks,
- Tom

> ---
>   gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/mi-var-invalidate.exp |  4 ++--
>   gdb/varobj.c                               | 18 +++++-------------
>   2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/mi-var-invalidate.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/mi-var-invalidate.exp
> index 1b2c68df18e..348515671c1 100644
> --- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/mi-var-invalidate.exp
> +++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/mi-var-invalidate.exp
> @@ -75,8 +75,8 @@ mi_runto_main
>   # Change format of floating variable immediately after reload reveals a
>   # bug where gdb still uses a free'd pointer.
>   mi_gdb_test "-var-set-format float_simple hexadecimal" \
> -        "\\^done,format=\"hexadecimal\",value=\"\\\[-1\\\]\"" \
> -       "set format variable float_simple"
> +	"\\^done,format=\"hexadecimal\",value=\"\\\[3\\\]\"" \
> +	"set format variable float_simple"
>   
>   # Check local variable is "invalid".
>   mi_gdb_test "-var-update linteger" \
> diff --git a/gdb/varobj.c b/gdb/varobj.c
> index 55a7bd97f43..d3df608c55f 100644
> --- a/gdb/varobj.c
> +++ b/gdb/varobj.c
> @@ -2359,29 +2359,21 @@ all_root_varobjs (gdb::function_view<void (struct varobj *var)> func)
>   static void
>   varobj_re_set_iter (struct varobj *var)
>   {
> -  /* Invalidated globals and floating var must be re-evaluated.  */
> -  if (var->root->global || var->root->floating)
> +  /* Invalidated global varobjs must be re-evaluated.  */
> +  if (!var->root->is_valid && var->root->global)
>       {
>         struct varobj *tmp_var;
>   
>         /* Try to create a varobj with same expression.  If we succeed
> -	 replace the old varobj, otherwise invalidate it.  */
> +	 and have a global replace the old varobj.  */
>         tmp_var = varobj_create (nullptr, var->name.c_str (), (CORE_ADDR) 0,
> -			       var->root->floating
> -			       ? USE_SELECTED_FRAME : USE_CURRENT_FRAME);
> -      if (tmp_var != nullptr)
> +			       USE_CURRENT_FRAME);
> +      if (tmp_var != nullptr && tmp_var->root->global)
>   	{
> -	  gdb_assert (var->root->floating == tmp_var->root->floating);
>   	  tmp_var->obj_name = var->obj_name;
>   	  varobj_delete (var, 0);
>   	  install_variable (tmp_var);
>   	}
> -      else if (var->root->global)
> -	{
> -	  /* Only invalidate globals as floating vars might still be valid in
> -	     some other frame.  */
> -	  var->root->is_valid = false;
> -	}
>       }
>   }
>   

  reply	other threads:[~2022-08-09 10:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-04 13:02 [PATCH 0/3] Varobj re_set clanup Lancelot SIX via Gdb-patches
2022-08-04 13:02 ` [PATCH 1/3] gdb/varobj: Do not invalidate locals in varobj_invalidate_iter Lancelot SIX via Gdb-patches
2022-08-05 15:03   ` Tom de Vries via Gdb-patches
2022-08-04 13:02 ` [PATCH 2/3] gdb/varobj: Reset varobj after relocations have been computed Lancelot SIX via Gdb-patches
2022-08-09 10:55   ` Tom de Vries via Gdb-patches
2022-08-04 13:02 ` [PATCH 3/3] gdb/varobj: Only re-evaluate invalid globals during re_set Lancelot SIX via Gdb-patches
2022-08-09 10:55   ` Tom de Vries via Gdb-patches [this message]
2022-08-11 14:07     ` Lancelot SIX via Gdb-patches

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f7b3e95e-5751-f52f-59d2-9fc73efe8986@suse.de \
    --to=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=lancelot.six@amd.com \
    --cc=lsix@lancelotsix.com \
    --cc=tdevries@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox