From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
To: Yao Qi <qiyaoltc@gmail.com>
Cc: binutils@sourceware.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] Disassembly unit test: disassemble one instruction
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 15:44:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f5c7d16b-ed74-a364-bb71-fc9bf21fa3b1@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170112153450.GF31406@E107787-LIN>
On 01/12/2017 03:34 PM, Yao Qi wrote:
> On 17-01-12 15:15:34, Pedro Alves wrote:
>> On 01/10/2017 12:26 PM, Yao Qi wrote:
>>> + class gdb_disassembler_test : public gdb_disassembler
>>> + {
>>> + public:
>>> +
>>> +#ifndef DISASSEMBLER_TEST_VERBOSE
>>> + explicit gdb_disassembler_test (struct gdbarch *gdbarch,
>>> + const gdb_byte *insn)
>>> + : gdb_disassembler (gdbarch, ui_file_new (),
>>> + gdb_disassembler_test::read_memory),
>>> + m_insn (insn)
>>> + {
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + ~gdb_disassembler_test ()
>>> + {
>>> + ui_file_delete ((struct ui_file *) m_di.stream);
>>
>>
>> Hmm, looks like you've made m_di be "protected" for
>> these uses.
>>
>> But we have the public stream() method already,
>> so I think could be:
>>
>> ~gdb_disassembler_test ()
>> {
>> ui_file_delete (stream ());
>> }
>>
>> You could then make m_di private again.
>>
>> But you shouldn't really need to create a new stream for
>> testing. We have other places that want to print to a
>> a null stream. We can factor out out the null_stream creation
>> from gdb_insn_length into a new function:
>>
>> struct ui_file *
>> null_stream ()
>> {
>> static struct ui_file *stream = NULL;
>>
>> if (stream == NULL)
>> {
>> stream = ui_file_new ();
>> make_final_cleanup (do_ui_file_delete, stream);
>> }
>> return stream;
>> }
>>
>> and then use it wherever necessary.
>>
>
> I did write code that way, but I changed it because the destroy of
> stream is done in cleanup. I want the test case depends on other
> part of GDB as less as possible. I hope this test case can be run
> even without cleanup stuff. It is sort of RAII (stream is regarded
> as resource).
Note that's a _final_ cleanup. I.e., it only runs when GDB exits.
There's no need for gdb_disassembler_test to destroy the stream
with that.
And in my palves/cxx-eliminate-cleanups branch, where I've
C++-fied the whole ui_file hierarchy, the cleanup completely
disappears.
Thanks,
Pedro Alves
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-12 15:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 79+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-10 12:26 [PATCH 0/8] Handle memory error on disassemble Yao Qi
2017-01-10 12:26 ` [PATCH 7/8] Disassembly unit test: memory error Yao Qi
2017-01-10 12:26 ` [PATCH 5/8] Remove magic numbers in m68k-dis.c:print_insn_arg Yao Qi
2017-01-11 22:14 ` Alan Modra
2017-01-13 12:23 ` Yao Qi
2017-01-10 12:26 ` [PATCH 6/8] Return -1 on memory error in print_insn_m68k Yao Qi
2017-01-11 22:15 ` Alan Modra
2017-01-12 11:50 ` Yao Qi
2017-01-12 14:38 ` Alan Modra
2017-01-12 14:52 ` Yao Qi
2017-01-13 1:54 ` Alan Modra
2017-01-13 12:29 ` Yao Qi
2017-01-10 12:26 ` [PATCH 4/8] Return -1 on memory error in print_insn_msp430 Yao Qi
2017-01-11 21:54 ` Alan Modra
2017-01-12 9:43 ` Yao Qi
2017-01-10 12:26 ` [PATCH 3/8] Disassembly unit test: disassemble one instruction Yao Qi
2017-01-11 21:15 ` Simon Marchi
2017-01-12 13:06 ` Pedro Alves
2017-01-12 17:03 ` Yao Qi
2017-01-12 17:43 ` Pedro Alves
2017-01-12 21:04 ` Yao Qi
2017-01-12 14:35 ` Pedro Alves
2017-01-12 15:15 ` Pedro Alves
2017-01-12 15:35 ` Yao Qi
2017-01-12 15:44 ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2017-01-12 16:06 ` Pedro Alves
2017-01-10 12:27 ` [PATCH 2/8] Call print_insn_mep in mep_gdb_print_insn Yao Qi
2017-01-11 20:50 ` Simon Marchi
2017-01-12 12:21 ` Yao Qi
2017-01-10 12:27 ` [PATCH 8/8] Don't throw exception in dis_asm_memory_error Yao Qi
2017-01-12 16:40 ` Pedro Alves
2017-01-12 21:09 ` Yao Qi
2017-01-10 12:27 ` [PATCH 1/8] Refactor disassembly code Yao Qi
2017-01-11 20:43 ` Simon Marchi
2017-01-12 12:19 ` Yao Qi
2017-01-12 12:36 ` Pedro Alves
2017-01-12 15:29 ` Simon Marchi
2017-01-16 10:03 ` [PATCH 0/6 v2] Handle memory error on disassemble Yao Qi
2017-01-16 10:03 ` [PATCH 2/6] Refactor disassembly code Yao Qi
2017-01-17 14:14 ` Luis Machado
2017-01-18 16:34 ` Yao Qi
2017-01-18 16:53 ` Luis Machado
2017-01-16 10:03 ` [PATCH 6/6] Don't throw exception in dis_asm_memory_error Yao Qi
2017-01-17 14:42 ` Luis Machado
2017-01-18 14:54 ` Yao Qi
2017-01-18 14:58 ` Luis Machado
2017-01-16 10:03 ` [PATCH 3/6] Call print_insn_mep in mep_gdb_print_insn Yao Qi
2017-01-17 14:19 ` Luis Machado
2017-01-24 10:08 ` Yao Qi
2017-01-24 13:41 ` Luis Machado
2017-01-16 10:03 ` [PATCH 4/6] Disassembly unit test: disassemble one instruction Yao Qi
2017-01-20 0:04 ` Pedro Alves
2017-01-24 15:23 ` Yao Qi
2017-02-02 16:46 ` Pedro Alves
2017-02-02 22:12 ` Yao Qi
2017-02-02 23:39 ` [pushed] Fix "maintenance selftest" printing stray instructions (Re: [PATCH 4/6] Disassembly unit test: disassemble one instruction) Pedro Alves
2017-01-16 10:03 ` [PATCH 5/6] Disassembly unit test: memory error Yao Qi
2017-01-17 14:38 ` Luis Machado
2017-01-24 15:33 ` Yao Qi
2017-01-20 0:08 ` Pedro Alves
2017-01-16 10:03 ` [PATCH 1/6] New function null_stream Yao Qi
2017-01-17 13:49 ` Luis Machado
2017-01-18 14:45 ` Yao Qi
2017-01-18 14:53 ` Luis Machado
2017-01-18 14:57 ` Simon Marchi
2017-01-18 15:02 ` Luis Machado
2017-01-18 15:18 ` Simon Marchi
2017-01-18 15:29 ` Luis Machado
2017-01-18 15:54 ` Simon Marchi
2017-01-18 16:36 ` Luis Machado
2017-01-25 8:38 ` [PATCH 0/6 v3] Handle memory error on disassembly Yao Qi
2017-01-25 8:38 ` [PATCH 4/6] Disassembly unit test: disassemble one instruction Yao Qi
2017-01-25 8:38 ` [PATCH 3/6] Call print_insn_mep in mep_gdb_print_insn Yao Qi
2017-01-25 8:38 ` [PATCH 6/6] Don't throw exception in dis_asm_memory_error Yao Qi
2017-01-25 8:38 ` [PATCH 1/6] New function null_stream Yao Qi
2017-01-25 8:38 ` [PATCH 5/6] Disassembly unit test: memory error Yao Qi
2017-01-25 8:38 ` [PATCH 2/6] Refactor disassembly code Yao Qi
2017-01-26 11:34 ` [PATCH 0/6 v3] Handle memory error on disassembly Pedro Alves
2017-01-26 15:00 ` Yao Qi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f5c7d16b-ed74-a364-bb71-fc9bf21fa3b1@redhat.com \
--to=palves@redhat.com \
--cc=binutils@sourceware.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=qiyaoltc@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox