Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@ericsson.com>
To: Nick Clifton <nickc@redhat.com>,
	Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca>,
	<gdb-patches@sourceware.org>, <binutils@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Bump to autoconf 2.69 and automake 1.15.1
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2018 14:38:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <eeeca5ba-4f35-7deb-78fc-3eb73bf6f31a@ericsson.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <df0ee0e1-8e97-ffb6-edb2-c0aee39b262f@redhat.com>

On 2018-06-15 10:22 AM, Nick Clifton wrote:
> Hi Simon,
> 
>> And to avoid requiring multiple
>> builds of autoconf/automake, it was suggested that we bump the required
>> version of those tools for all binutils-gdb.
> 
> Thanks very much for taking on this task.

Thanks for looking at it!

> You do not appear to have updated the AC_PREREQ macro statements in the
> various */configure.ac files.  Is this intentional ?

No, it's an oversight.  I have changed them locally.

> Also the config/override.m4 file still contains a hard coded requirement 
> for autoconf 2.64 exactly.

Are you talking about this?

dnl Fix 2.64 cross compile detection for AVR and RTEMS
dnl by not trying to compile fopen.
m4_if(m4_defn([m4_PACKAGE_VERSION]), [2.64],
  [m4_foreach([_GCC_LANG], [C, C++, Fortran, Fortran 77],
     [m4_define([_AC_LANG_IO_PROGRAM(]_GCC_LANG[)], m4_defn([AC_LANG_PROGRAM(]_GCC_LANG[)]))])])


If I understand correctly, this patched an Autoconf 2.64 issue?  So you are
suggesting that we can remove it now?

> The patch did not include renamed *.texinfo files, although that was
> simple enough to fix.

I have included some (bfd, ld) but might have forgotten others.  Can you
point me to the ones I have forgotten so I can fix it?

Thanks,

Simon


  reply	other threads:[~2018-06-15 14:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-06-15  0:43 Simon Marchi
2018-06-15  0:46 ` [PATCH 2/2] Generated files Simon Marchi
2018-06-15  3:00   ` Simon Marchi
2018-06-15 14:22 ` [PATCH 1/2] Bump to autoconf 2.69 and automake 1.15.1 Nick Clifton
2018-06-15 14:38   ` Simon Marchi [this message]
2018-06-15 14:58     ` Nick Clifton
2018-06-15 15:14       ` Simon Marchi
2018-06-15 15:30         ` Nick Clifton
2018-06-15 15:38           ` Simon Marchi
2018-06-15 15:54             ` Nick Clifton
2018-06-16  1:39   ` Alan Modra
2018-06-16  3:56     ` Simon Marchi
2018-06-16  7:17       ` Andreas Schwab
2018-06-18  2:46       ` Alan Modra
2018-06-18  3:05         ` Simon Marchi
2018-06-18  9:42           ` Nick Clifton
2018-06-15 17:29 ` Joseph Myers
2018-06-16  3:05   ` Simon Marchi
2018-06-18 15:12     ` Joseph Myers
2018-06-18 15:32       ` Simon Marchi
2018-06-16 22:41 ` Andreas K. Huettel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=eeeca5ba-4f35-7deb-78fc-3eb73bf6f31a@ericsson.com \
    --to=simon.marchi@ericsson.com \
    --cc=binutils@sourceware.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=nickc@redhat.com \
    --cc=simon.marchi@polymtl.ca \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox