From: Simon Marchi <simark@simark.ca>
To: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/16] Remove the exec_bfd macro
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 17:34:22 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dd30c9c7-a309-f66c-ed66-5e8f3d99b3d4@simark.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87mu0gd26t.fsf@tromey.com>
On 2020-10-20 5:20 p.m., Tom Tromey wrote:
> Simon> Maybe just check for lines that are too long after the replacement.
>
> Will do.
>
>>> - add_target_sections (&exec_bfd, sections);
>>> + add_target_sections (¤t_program_space->ebfd, sections);
>
> Simon> It's odd that the owner of these sections is the address of the ebfd
> Simon> field in the program_space structure, and not the bfd pointer itself.
> Simon> Do you know if this is done on purpose?
>
> There's probably no good reason for it, though I'm not completely sure.
>
> Simon> I don't see anything that could change the value of exec bfd in the mean
> Simon> time, that would make the "owner" value of these sections stale. So I
> Simon> believe it would be safe to use `current_program_space->exec_bfd ()` as
> Simon> the owner.
>
> Or even just the program space itself.
> The value is really just a cookie to make sure that different callers
> don't accidentally clash.
True, but I think it would be more confusing, since the target sections
are derived from the exec bfd.
Simon
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-20 21:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-19 21:44 [PATCH v2 00/16] Remove some macros from exec.h and progspace.h Tom Tromey
2020-10-19 21:44 ` [PATCH v2 01/16] Add target_section constructor Tom Tromey
2020-10-19 21:44 ` [PATCH v2 02/16] Remove exec_filename macro Tom Tromey
2020-10-19 21:44 ` [PATCH v2 03/16] Change exec_close to be a method on program_space Tom Tromey
2020-10-19 21:44 ` [PATCH v2 04/16] Remove commented-out code from gcore.c Tom Tromey
2020-10-20 14:01 ` [PP?] " Simon Marchi
2020-10-29 1:19 ` Tom Tromey
2020-10-19 21:44 ` [PATCH v2 05/16] Remove exec_bfd_mtime define Tom Tromey
2020-10-19 21:44 ` [PATCH v2 06/16] Remove current_target_sections macro Tom Tromey
2020-10-19 21:44 ` [PATCH v2 07/16] Remove the exec_bfd macro Tom Tromey
2020-10-20 14:24 ` Simon Marchi
2020-10-20 21:20 ` Tom Tromey
2020-10-20 21:34 ` Simon Marchi [this message]
2020-10-19 21:44 ` [PATCH v2 08/16] Change program_space::ebfd to a gdb_bfd_ref_ptr Tom Tromey
2020-10-19 21:44 ` [PATCH v2 09/16] Remove symfile_objfile macro Tom Tromey
2020-10-19 21:44 ` [PATCH v2 10/16] Change clear_program_space_solib_cache to method on program_space Tom Tromey
2020-10-19 21:44 ` [PATCH v2 11/16] Change program_space_empty_p " Tom Tromey
2020-10-19 21:44 ` [PATCH v2 12/16] Change remove_target_sections " Tom Tromey
2020-10-20 14:40 ` [PP?] " Simon Marchi
2020-10-29 1:24 ` Tom Tromey
2020-10-19 21:44 ` [PATCH v2 13/16] Change add_target_sections " Tom Tromey
2020-10-19 21:44 ` [PATCH v2 14/16] Change add_target_sections_of_objfile " Tom Tromey
2020-10-19 21:44 ` [PATCH v2 15/16] Don't change current program space in exec_target::close Tom Tromey
2020-10-19 21:44 ` [PATCH v2 16/16] Remove call to exec_close Tom Tromey
2020-10-20 14:46 ` [PP?] [PATCH v2 00/16] Remove some macros from exec.h and progspace.h Simon Marchi
2020-10-29 21:06 ` Tom Tromey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=dd30c9c7-a309-f66c-ed66-5e8f3d99b3d4@simark.ca \
--to=simark@simark.ca \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=tom@tromey.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox