Re: [RFA/Prec] Add signal support for process record

[Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>]

On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 01:41, Michael Snyder<msnyder@vmware.com> wrote:
> Hui Zhu wrote:
>>
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> After discussion with Michael,  we decide to deal with this issue step by
>> step.
>> This is the fix bug patch.  It will fix the after get sig, inferior
>> get a lot of sig.  Please help me with it.
>
> This takes care of the immediate problem, which is that the
> signals get delivered over and over during the record mode.
>
> Please check this in.

Thanks.  Checked in.

Hui

>
>
>> 2009-08-31  Hui Zhu  <teawater@gmail.com>
>>
>>        * record.c (record_resume_siggnal): Deleted.
>>        (record_resume): Ditto.
>>        (record_wait): Change record_resume_siggnal to
>>        TARGET_SIGNAL_0.
>>
>> ---
>>  record.c |    4 +---
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> --- a/record.c
>> +++ b/record.c
>> @@ -514,7 +514,6 @@ record_close (int quitting)
>>  }
>>
>>  static int record_resume_step = 0;
>> -static enum target_signal record_resume_siggnal;
>>  static int record_resume_error;
>>
>>  static void
>> @@ -522,7 +521,6 @@ record_resume (struct target_ops *ops, p
>>                enum target_signal siggnal)
>>  {
>>   record_resume_step = step;
>> -  record_resume_siggnal = siggnal;
>>
>>   if (!RECORD_IS_REPLAY)
>>     {
>> @@ -638,7 +636,7 @@ record_wait (struct target_ops *ops,
>>                        }
>>                      record_beneath_to_resume
>> (record_beneath_to_resume_ops,
>>                                                ptid, 1,
>> -                                               record_resume_siggnal);
>> +                                               TARGET_SIGNAL_0);
>>                      continue;
>>                    }
>>                }
>
>