Re: [RFA] Patch to fix "reverse-step" command error

[Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>]

PING

On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 16:13, Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Marc and Michael,
>
> Sorry I forget this issue just reproduce in SLED 10.
>
> I reproduced it with cvs-head and patch can fix it.  Michael, Please
> help me review it.
>
> The attachment is the new patch follow cvs-head.
>
> 2009-05-06  Hui Zhu  <teawater@gmail.com>
>
>       * infrun.c (handle_inferior_event): Make inferior insert
>       breakpoint at right address or step in reverse and it stepped
>       into dynsym resolve code.
>
> Thanks,
> Hui
>
> On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 13:31, Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi Marc,
>>
>> I cannot reproduce this issue with cvs-head.
>> Could you please help me test with this issue?
>> If both of us cannot reproduce this issue,  I think I can give up this patch.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Hui
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 14:10, teawater <teawater@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hi Michael,
>>>
>>> This patch is for bug in
>>> http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2009-02/msg00246.html.
>>>
>>> The reason of bug is when inferior reverse exection into dynsym
>>> resolve code, gdb doesn't insert breakpoint in right address.
>>> It just happen in some distributions for example SLED.
>>>
>>> This patch make gdb insert breakpoint in right address or step in that case.
>>>
>>> 2008-03-02  Hui Zhu  <teawater@gmail.com>
>>>
>>>       * infrun.c (handle_inferior_event): Make inferior insert
>>>       breakpoint at right address or step in reverse and it stepped
>>>       into dynsym resolve code.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Hui
>>>
>>
>