From: Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>
To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>, Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [RFA] print error message if (auto) disassembly failed
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 05:33:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <daef60380904162232g52362142m7c64ad89f7af86fe@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090416235944.GP7585@adacore.com>
Hi Guys,
Sorry for late.
In before, when the user step into the program that don't have line
message, they will lost the the help from debuger. They will not
know what will happen in next except a pc address.
For now, this auto will auto output the asm code. I think it will
make user experience (special for new user) better.
And I think Joel's patch fix the bug.
So I suggest keep it default "auto".
Thanks,
Hui
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 07:59, Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com> wrote:
>> The default is "auto", which means:
>>
>> If AUTO (which is the default), or there's no line info to determine
>> the source line of the next instruction, display disassembly of next
>> instruction instead. */
>>
>> But I agree with you that this is the wrong default.
>> I think the default should be "off".
>
> Would anyone object to changing the default to "off"?
>
> --
> Joel
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-17 5:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-16 17:39 Joel Brobecker
2009-04-16 17:52 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-04-16 18:02 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-04-16 18:16 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-04-16 19:07 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-04-16 21:37 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-04-16 21:54 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-04-16 22:09 ` Pedro Alves
2009-04-17 9:10 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-04-16 23:57 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-04-17 7:33 ` Hui Zhu
2009-04-17 9:22 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-04-17 15:50 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-04-17 17:34 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2009-04-17 22:16 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-04-18 6:48 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-04-16 22:23 ` Tom Tromey
2009-04-16 23:59 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-04-17 5:33 ` Hui Zhu [this message]
2009-04-17 15:57 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-04-17 16:16 ` Tom Tromey
2009-04-17 16:59 ` Hui Zhu
2009-04-17 9:23 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-04-17 10:05 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-04-23 18:49 ` Joel Brobecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=daef60380904162232g52362142m7c64ad89f7af86fe@mail.gmail.com \
--to=teawater@gmail.com \
--cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=tromey@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox