Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom de Vries via Gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Cc: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
Subject: [PING][PATCH][gdb/testsuite] Reimplement gdb.gdb/python-interrupts.exp as unittest
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2021 16:36:39 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cf0dd2db-90e7-0e28-d711-af9881bbc0b2@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d767624c-250e-9777-ee07-e7160a68c0bb@suse.de>

On 9/22/21 12:17 PM, Tom de Vries wrote:
> On 9/11/21 2:02 PM, Tom de Vries wrote:
>> +#if GDB_SELF_TEST
>> +namespace selftests {
>> +extern void (*hook_set_active_ext_lang) (void);
>> +void (*hook_set_active_ext_lang) (void) = nullptr;
>> +}
>> +#endif
>> +
>>  /* Set the currently active extension language to NOW_ACTIVE.
>>     The result is a pointer to a malloc'd block of memory to pass to
>>     restore_active_ext_lang.
>> @@ -708,6 +715,11 @@ install_gdb_sigint_handler (struct signal_handler *previous)
>>  struct active_ext_lang_state *
>>  set_active_ext_lang (const struct extension_language_defn *now_active)
>>  {
>> +#if GDB_SELF_TEST
>> +  if (selftests::hook_set_active_ext_lang)
>> +    selftests::hook_set_active_ext_lang ();
>> +#endif
> 
> In particular, I'd like feedback on whether this is acceptable.
> 
> F.i., I could do instead the less intrusive (but also less flexible):
> ...
> #if GDB_SELF_TEST
> namespace selftests {
> extern int hook_raise_at_entry_active_ext_lang;
> int hook_raise_at_entry_active_ext_lang = 0;
> #endif
> 
> struct active_ext_lang_state *
> set_active_ext_lang (const struct extension_language_defn *now_active)
> {
> #if GDB_SELF_TEST
>   if (selftests::hook_raise_at_entry_active_ext_lang)
>     raise (hook_raise_at_entry_active_ext_lang);
> #endif
> ...
> 
> The hook that is a function pointer is the most flexible, but possibly
> less safe.  OTOH, it is in the selftest code, which we disable by
> default in release branches, so by default this is not included in
> releases.  OTOH, it's still possible to enable it in releases using
> --enable-unit-tests. Perhaps this could be handled using a
> DEVEL_GDB_SELF_TEST, which is disabled in release branches independent
> of --enable-unit-tests?
> 
> Any comment appreciated.
> 

Ping.

Thanks,
- Tom


  reply	other threads:[~2021-10-07 14:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-11 12:02 [PATCH][gdb/testsuite] " Tom de Vries via Gdb-patches
2021-09-22 10:17 ` Tom de Vries via Gdb-patches
2021-10-07 14:36   ` Tom de Vries via Gdb-patches [this message]
2021-10-19 18:10   ` Tom Tromey
2021-10-19 22:00     ` Tom de Vries via Gdb-patches
2021-10-19 18:09 ` Tom Tromey
2021-10-19 21:56   ` Tom de Vries via Gdb-patches

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=cf0dd2db-90e7-0e28-d711-af9881bbc0b2@suse.de \
    --to=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=tdevries@suse.de \
    --cc=tom@tromey.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox